A Boring Dystopia

9748 readers

275 users here now

Pictures, Videos, Articles showing just how boring it is to live in a dystopic society, or with signs of a dystopic society.

Rules (Subject to Change)

--Be a Decent Human Being

--Posting news articles: include the source name and exact title from article in your post title

--Posts must have something to do with the topic

--Zero tolerance for Racism/Sexism/Ableism/etc.

--No NSFW content

--Abide by the rules of lemmy.world

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

givesomefucks

187

Mean world syndrome has reacted a fever pitch. (lemmy.world)

submitted 6 months ago by STRIKINGdebate2 to c/aboringdystopia

148 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[+] AllonzeeLV -8 points 6 months ago (2 children)

[removed by mod]

[–] I_Fart_Glitter 18 points 6 months ago (1 children)

It's clear you are choosing not to understand the difference between what you said and what the question said. I can't save you from your willful ignorance.

[+] AllonzeeLV -8 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

[removed by mod]

[–] [email protected] 9 points 6 months ago

Well, judging by your levelheadedness here, she obviously has nothing to worry about. /s

[–] I_Fart_Glitter 4 points 6 months ago

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Straw_man

A straw man fallacy (sometimes written as strawman) is the informal fallacy of refuting an argument different from the one actually under discussion, while not recognizing or acknowledging the distinction. One who engages in this fallacy is said to be "attacking a straw man".

The typical straw man argument creates the illusion of having refuted or defeated an opponent's proposition through the covert replacement of it with a different proposition (i.e., "stand up a straw man") and the subsequent refutation of that false argument ("knock down a straw man") instead of the opponent's proposition. Straw man arguments have been used throughout history in polemical debate, particularly regarding highly charged emotional subjects.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Even if 99% of men were not abusers, the 1% that are also tend to hide their malice and pretend to be decent until alone and the woman is vulnerable. So as women interact with hundreds or thousands of men over their lifetimes they will come across these abusers or know someone who was abused and that the system blames victims and the fear is not just about percentage chance of a horrible outcome, but that society continues the abuse.

A bear is a known factor, dangerous but never in a deceptive way and society doesn't tend to blame victims of animal attacks.

Also the percentage of abusers is way higher than 1%. Everyone knows multiple rape and abuse victims, but few people know someone who was mauled by a bear. That is the context for this question.