this post was submitted on 07 May 2024
14 points (100.0% liked)
DM Academy
711 readers
1 users here now
A community for discussion, questions, tools, or advice regarding being a Dungeon Master (or Game Master) for Dungeons and Dragons or RPG's in general
/c/DnD Network Communities
- Dungeons and Dragons
- Dungeons and Dragons - Art
- Dungeons and Dragons - Homebrew
- Dungeons and Dragons - Memes and Comics
- Dungeons and Dragons - AI
- Dungeons and Dragons - Looking for Group
Rules (Subject to Change)
- Be a Decent Human Being
- There are 4 types of posts here, Questions, Advice, Articles, and Tools; Stories belong in [email protected]
- DO NOT Downvote simple or beginner questions, this is a space for EVERYONE from beginners to advanced DMs
- No Piracy, this includes links to torrent sites, hosted content, streaming content, etc. Please see this post for details
- Zero tolerance for Racism/Sexism/Ableism/etc.
- No NSFW content
- Abide by the rules of lemmy.world
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I'm skipping the other comments because I don't want them to affect my thought process.
Your idea makes sense. Lots of IRL museums will put a replica on display, for reasons like value and risk of theft, risk of damage to the item even through regular light and air, or just because it's being restored or used for research at the moment.
I don't think they'd be able to create two items out of it, though. That's basically just cloning an item, though without the magic in the clone. That's not really something that is done.
I don't think a museum would be happy with an original artifact walking around. They'd want the original on hand for preservation and future research. Adventurers tend to lose, break, or sell things.
But you want the party to have the magic item, so I think you need to find a reason for them to change their minds and refuse to give up the item. You said it's a criminal collector, but I don't think garden-variety theft, smuggling, etc. makes it worth denying them, especially if they pay well for it. Can you make the collector evil somehow? Or at least make the artifacts useful for doing good, and putting them in a museum would mean people go hungry or something?
I didn't want the items to end up with the somewhat evil collector anyways. As far as I know my players, they'll side with the museum, even if it means less money – one of them is a librarian/protector of knowledge kinda cleric.
You bring up similar points to the other commenters regarding the safety of displaying originals. That's definitely something I'll argue with.
Right now I'm thinking they'll transfer the magic to something my group can use, use the original (now inert) items for preservation/research and display illusory copies.
Thank you for taking the time to answer so thoroughly!
Is he/could he be associated with the museum somehow? Maybe if his Cleric (order? temple? organization?) is a major sponsor of the museum or something similar they might trust him with those items for that reason with the caveat that he brings them back for scheduled viewings or some sort of thing like that?
I like the idea, but they actually have a very detailed backstory and connecting them to the museum would be somewhat unbelievable.
They were the very bookish librarian of a very small and remote monastery where they grew up and only left because they ran out of reading material.
I'll definitely stick a mental pin in your idea though, maybe we'll find a reason for that connection.