this post was submitted on 06 May 2024
50 points (90.3% liked)
New York Times gift articles
582 readers
240 users here now
Share your New York Times gift articles links here.
Rules:
- Only post New York Times gift article links.
Info:
- The NYT Open Team. (2021-06-23). “A New Way to Share New York Times Stories”. open.nytimes.com.
- “Gift Articles for New York Times Subscribers”. (n.d.). help.nytimes.com.
Tip:
- Google "unlocked_article_code" and limit search results to the past week.
- Mastodon: Use control-F or ⌘-F to search this page. (ref)
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Thats confirmation bias.
The fact is that cutting out carbs results in weight loss because you cut calories by cutting carbs, cutting out processed foods will do largely the same. Going vegetarian often results in weight loss, "Intermittent fasting" doesnt have any special effect on the body, provided you dont eat like a pig in your feeding window its just the fact you're eating during less time in the day.
Not disputing you got great results or that cutting out processed food cant have other benefits, but I work out alot and eat a lot of "ultra processed" protein powder/protein bars and premade meals and I've also seen amazing results.
The fact is that if you calculate your maintenance calories and then track what you eat you will be amazed at just how fast it all adds up.
Its all about your relationship with food, anyone who pays attention to what they put in and how much of it will ALWAYS have better results than people who dont.
There's an extra factor in there, at least for some people. Carbs, particularly processed carbs, create an insulin response. That insulin response makes you hungry. Ever wondered about the cliche about eating Chinese food and being hungry an hour later? It's from the rice, with its high glycemic index. It doesn't affect everyone, but it does affect a lot of people.
No surprise, you eat less when you're less hungry (or hungry less of the time). It's also where intermittent fasting comes in, although that's a lot tougher to demonstrate.
You're right. I was talking more about the weight loss, I kind of wrote that post terribly. Everything that Ive read shows that while insulin response and fasting may have some physiological benefits (which will vary wildly from person to person) in addition to the low GI foods making it easier to stay on a diet because you feel full longer and more energetic all day the benefits of simply not eating too much calories is universal.
You can absolutely have a diet based on high GI, calorie dense food and still lose weight. But its going to suck.
I'm not entirely attributing my weight loss to not eating ultraprocessed food, but that was was part of it. I'm sharing what I experienced when I did that and not trying to argue a point or do a scientific experiment, so I'm not sure how confirmation bias entirely comes into play here.
I did not specifically set out to reduce my carbohydrate intake. I still eat rice with meals as I normally do, but I also did what the article describes and subtituted the ultraprocessed foods in my diet with less processed food. My goals were to reduce that, sugar, and alcohol.
Yeah my post was quite poorly written.
You lost weight and feel better by cutting out processed foods a great many of which are very calorie dense and heavy on carbs was what I meant. Which is not to say carbs are bad, I know people who went vegan and lost a ton of weight and felt great despite eating more carbs, People who went Keto and ate tons of fats and lost weight and felt great and people like myself who leaned into macros (and I eat a lot of certain processed foods) all the people had in common was that they took an interest into their diet and what and how much of it they were putting into their bodies.
I didnt mean to make it sound like I'm shitting on what worked for you because thats the important thing, you found a method that worked for you and stuck to it.