Technology

60078 readers

4458 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

532

That time when Microsoft bought and killed Nokia phone unit (www.theregister.com)

submitted 7 months ago by [email protected] to c/technology

99 comments fedilink hide all child comments

When bad management meets bad software, even great hardware is useless

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 42 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Nokia should have continued developing the Linux Qt system maemo/meego. I was working with it as subcontractor in Nokia, and it was awesome. The Qt/C++ was really fast to code, and you could basically port KDE apps into it with small effort.

If they would have continued with it, we could have had three major OS in phones.

I was leading architect in internal UI design tools, and the tools had features that android/apple toolsets not even now have. Mainly because you could run the Qt app with PC hardware without any emulation.

[–] wjrii 9 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Sounds like it wasn't really your area, but good lord the N810/N900 were some of the most beautiful pieces of industrial design I've ever used. Maemo was delightful to use too, don't get me wrong, and I loved tethering it to my featurephone and getting a decent mobile experience, as well as doing my first practical in-car navigation with the GPS and the mapping software that was available, but those things were an overlooked gem of hardware, like something straight out of Star Trek.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Nokia was lead by engineers, which was it's strength, but eventually also caused it's downfall. This is why these things were so good.

Engineers told that the fullscreen displays without keyboard is never as good as physical keyboard.

Engineers told that 1 day battery life is not enough, the system need to be designed so that it can last a week.

They were right.

BUT apple's marketing and slick design convinced the American market that you can give up on those features. Nokia could easily made the same design, but didn't because engineers thought that users need those features. When they turned ship and accepted it, apple had its foot between the door already.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago

I mean, it got a hit, but what ended it was the Elopian suicide.

Also about slick design ... That's subjective, but even Windows Mobile looked better than Apple stuff.

And Nokia UI design was just perfect.