Can it really be that there are Star Wars fans who see George Lucas’s Episode I – The Phantom Menace, once considered the emblem of everything that went wrong with the long-running space saga, as a bona fide classic ripe for rehabilitation 25 years on? As the much-derided 1999 film returns to cinemas this weekend, there are rumblings in the ether that millennials, and perhaps those even younger, are completely unaware of just how much of a disaster it was. Then again, perhaps those of us who remember its debut in cinemas should be prepared to listen to voices from a new generation. Was it really so bad after all?
Part of the problem is that where it was once a rare blot on the galactic landscape, a Star Wars movie that failed to live up to the glories of the original trilogy, these days it’s far, far away from being the only rubbish film in the canon. In fact, it could be argued that when considering movies such as the execrable The Rise of Skywalker, the middling Solo: A Star Wars Story and the two painful prequel follow-ups, The Phantom Menace is closer to the mean average for the saga than it is to the bottom of the Dagobah swamp.
Where once we were shocked that something so tonally misguided, blithely racist and prosaically bloodless could be tagged with the famous title, we now have the Star Wars Holiday Special to remind us that it can get worse. Back at the turn of the century, few of us were aware that 70s and 80s misfires like this even existed – see also Caravan of Courage: An Ewok Adventure and Ewoks: The Battle for Endor – it being the pre YouTube era when all but the most studious of geeks were blissfully ignorant of them.
Having a huge love for the original trilogy, could a new film possibly have any chance with the hype that came before it.
Short answer, no.
I rewatched the prequel trilogy a few years ago, hadn't watched them for over a decade. In my opinion, Phantom Menace actually comes out best of the three. Possibly because there's a lot of practical work and the following films were pushing a lot of early digital and it hasn't held up well.
I think 1 spent a lot of time world building. It makes sense since it was the "first" film, and I think that's it's largest issue. It's slow compared to the other films, and in a time where everyone wanted action that's bad. Modern media is much more in favor of spending time on world building.
That said, Jar Jar is horrible. He singlehandedly makes me think this opinion might be wrong and they're just bad. I don't know how the hell they let him happen, but every moment with him on screen is painful.