Formula 1

9137 readers

3 users here now

Welcome to Formula1 @ Lemmy.world Lemmy's largest community for Formula 1 and related racing series

Rules

Be respectful to everyone; drivers, lemmings, redditors etc
No gambling, crypto or NFTs
Spoilers are allowed
Non English articles should include a translation in the comments by deepl.com or similar
Paywalled articles should include at least a brief summary in the comments, the wording of the article should not be altered
Social media posts should be posted as screenshots with a link for those who want to view it
Memes are allowed on Monday only as we all do like a laugh or 2, but don’t want to become formuladank.

Up next

F1 Calendar

2025 Calendar

Location	Date
🇦🇺 Australia	14-16 Mar
🇨🇳 China	21-23 Mar
🇯🇵 Japan	04-06 Apr
🇧🇭 Bahrain	11-13 Apr
🇸🇦 Saudi Arabia	18-20 Apr
🇺🇸 United States	02-04 May
🇮🇹 Italy	16-18 May
🇲🇨 Monaco	23-25 May
🇪🇸 Spain	30 May-01 Jun
🇨🇦 Canada	13-15 Jun
🇦🇹 Austria	27-29 Jun
🇬🇧 Great Britain	04-06 Jul
🇧🇪 Belgium	25-27 Jul
🇭🇺 Hungary	01-03 Aug
🇳🇱 Netherlands	29-31 Aug
🇮🇹 Italy	05-07 Sep
🇦🇿 Azerbaijan	19-21 Sep
🇸🇬 Singapore	03-05 Oct
🇺🇸 United States	17-19 Oct
🇲🇽 Mexico	24-26 Oct
🇧🇷 Brazil	07-09 Nov
🇺🇸 United States	20-22 Nov
🇶🇦 Qatar	28-30 Nov
🇦🇪 Abu Dhabi	05-07 Dec

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

Photographer

wes

bwoah

U.S. Congress members demand answers on Andretti's exclusion from Formula 1 (www.nbcnews.com)

submitted 7 months ago by Rapidcreek to c/formula1

55 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Rapidcreek 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Sigh.

US laws apply to anybody or anything on US Ground. That includes people, business, and things like money and banking.

If you want to practice monopolistic business practices in other parts of the world and exclude the US and U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement countries, that is up to you and the antitrust laws of the EU and Britain.

If this is your way of saying you understand this is not a contract matter, say so.

[–] TheGrandNagus 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Exactly, and FOM isn't in the US, it's in the UK. I can show you a map if you like.

This really isn't complicated.

[–] Rapidcreek 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Exactly

So, it's not a contract issue

You are dead wrong about F1 being a foreign entity but suppose it is. Suppose it is incorporated in Britain instead of Delaware. Then it still can be indicted as was FIFA, a Swiss company, as this article explains.

https://www.cnbc.com/2015/05/27/why-fifa-is-being-prosecuted-in-the-us.html#:~:text=FIFA%20may%20be%20based%20in,some%20of%20its%20top%20officials.

BTW, the Feds won this case.

[–] TheGrandNagus 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

It is a foreign entity, are you stupid? The UK is not in the US. I can show you a map if you like. How could you possibly argue that a business based in the UK isn't a foreign entity to the US.

Currie explained that CONCACAF’s headquarters has been in the United States—in New York and then Florida—for the entire time period included in the indictment.

Doesn't apply to FOM.

Also, this covers financial crimes in which American financial companies and a headquarters based in the US was involved.

Very different to FOM, a British company, the FIA, a French company, and teams (various countries) setting standards on who can join their private club.

Should the NFL be under the jurisdiction of the UK?

[–] Rapidcreek 1 points 7 months ago

OK, we'll end this right here. You obviously are on the edge. I'll block you for good measure.