this post was submitted on 29 Apr 2024
67 points (100.0% liked)
Space
9200 readers
41 users here now
Share & discuss informative content on: Astrophysics, Cosmology, Space Exploration, Planetary Science and Astrobiology.
Rules
- Be respectful and inclusive.
- No harassment, hate speech, or trolling.
- Engage in constructive discussions.
- Share relevant content.
- Follow guidelines and moderators' instructions.
- Use appropriate language and tone.
- Report violations.
- Foster a continuous learning environment.
Picture of the Day
The Busy Center of the Lagoon Nebula
Related Communities
๐ญ Science
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
๐ Engineering
๐ Art and Photography
Other Cool Links
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
From the article...
I don't know why, but I find it strangely funny that it's only going to be 4G, and not 5G.
Regardless of the ranges issue of 4G versus 5G, I'm assuming that signal repeaters will be necessary for both of the protocols.
~Anti~ ~Commercial-AI~ ~license~ ~(CC~ ~BY-NC-SA~ ~4.0)~
There is actually very little difference in the range of 4G versus 5G. As long as the frequencies used remain the same, the only issue you might have is since bandwidths are wider, you need to have slightly more powerful radios and or lose some range due to dBm per megahert.
A 710 MHz frequency with a 20 MHz channel width will go the exact same distance on LTE and 5G.
Now that same 710 megahertz frequency with 80 megahertz on 5G will not go as far because of decibels per megahertz. But if you increase the power slightly, it will go the same distance.