this post was submitted on 29 Apr 2024
143 points (97.4% liked)

World News

39415 readers
3106 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CosmicCleric -4 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (8 children)

wave with your ICBM’s and threat everyone with nuclear warfare, rinse and repeat

Well, nothing stops someone from doing that today, except for MAD, which would exist even if Russia finished off Ukraine. NATO's 'line in the sand' is behind Ukraine, and not in front of it.

~Anti~ ~Commercial-AI~ ~license~ ~(CC~ ~BY-NC-SA~ ~4.0)~

[–] avater 7 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (5 children)

Well, nothing stops someone from doing that today, except for MUD, which would exist even if Russia finished off Ukraine. NATO’s ‘line in the sand’ is behind Ukraine, and not in front of it.

Of course but they can get all the countries that are not part of NATO, wait a few years and then come back with full strength, new ressources, new alliances and then we can ask ourselfs if there was not a place in time we could have prevented this...

Also I don't like the current course of the NATO that much. I'm all in for deescalation but at some point and after all the threats from Russia I really wish the NATO would step up and say, we don't want any encounters with Russia but if they choose to declare one of our allies as "war party" because of their support to Ukraine, we are behind and will defend them. I think this also would give some countries more confidence in supporting Ukraine with better weapons and supplies and show Russia that we mean business.

[–] CosmicCleric -1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (4 children)

Of course but they can get all the countries that are not part of NATO, wait a few years and then come back with full strength, new ressources, new alliances and then we can ask ourselfs if there was not a place in time we could have prevented this…

The theory of sound, but most countries look towards their own self-interest first (unfortunately), so it may be harder to get all the countries together than you state.

Still it's something we should try, it's better to unite around peace and stability beforehand, than after a war.

~Anti~ ~Commercial-AI~ ~license~ ~(CC~ ~BY-NC-SA~ ~4.0)~

[–] avater 0 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Finally, if we do as you state, is that sacrificing Ukraine in the process?

No, absolutely not. I'm son of an ukranian father, I want a united west against Putin and if I'm honest with you I think NATO should intervene like they did back in '99 in Kosovo.

I was deployed in Kosovo in 2007 and the people of Kosovo really appreciated the intervention of NATO, thanked us as soldiers after all these years and I think we have the same situation in Ukraine right now. Russia is commiting a genocide at the People of Ukraine. Russia must be stopped in their degenerated agenda of a new Russian Reich and I also think that a military operation on Ukrainian soil against russian forces would not lead to any stupid decisions by Putin. We "just" need to push them out of the country or at least create a no-fly zone and enforce this with NATO troops.

[–] CosmicCleric 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

My comment about sacrificing of Ukraine was just based on time delay, if Ukraine could hold out and wait that long for the other countries to get their act together, or not.

I wish the best for Ukraine.

~Anti~ ~Commercial-AI~ ~license~ ~(CC~ ~BY-NC-SA~ ~4.0)~

[–] avater 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

My comment about sacrificing of Ukraine was just based on time delay, if Ukraine could hold out and wait that long for the other countries to get their act together, or not.

I actually don't get where you think I would delay anything. I'm for a operation against Russia and more weapons and supplies for Ukraine right now, better yesterday. Hell, we should have established a NATO enforced no-fly zone right after the first missle pieces crossed the border of poland.

[–] CosmicCleric 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

I wasn't speaking about you personally, but just the time it would take to unite non-NATO countries with NATO and present a united front against Russia, when it comes to stopping their aggressions. Apologies for the confusion.

~Anti~ ~Commercial-AI~ ~license~ ~(CC~ ~BY-NC-SA~ ~4.0)~

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)