this post was submitted on 27 Apr 2024
64 points (95.7% liked)

World News

39387 readers
3051 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Last year, a pilot program was launched in a Canadian province allowing adults to carry up to 2.5 grams of hard drugs for personal use. Soaring drug use in public spaces has raised concerns over public safety.

The Canadian province of British Columbia is reversing its policy of allowing the open use of hard drugs in public.

Premier David Eby said Friday that police will soon have the power again to enforce drug use laws in all public places, including hospitals, restaurants, parks, and beaches.

It brings to an end a much-criticized pilot program that allowed the personal use of some illegal drugs, including cocaine, methamphetamine, MDMA, heroin, morphine, and fentanyl. 

The program launched in January last year, to remove the stigma associated with drug use that keeps people from seeking help, was supposed to run for three years.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] gimpchrist 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

'Safe cigarettes' or unadulterated cigarettes, I guess, are actually a great idea.. we should allow native populations in Canada to grow and produce tobacco cigarettes with no additives.. I think that would be great

[–] FlyingSquid 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)
[–] gimpchrist 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I'm not 100% up on the legalities of cigarette stuff but every cigarette in Canada has additives even the reserve cigarettes, and people are arrested for having Reserve cigarettes so I don't know how they're legally allowed to sell the cigarettes that they do produce, but it's awfully regulated for sure.... I haven't heard of one Canadian native group that grows, harvests, and produces additive free cigarettes.. maybe they exist, but they sure aren't promoted if they do exist

[–] FlyingSquid 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I'm sorry, by 'grow and produce,' I didn't realize you meant some sort of mass-production for sale.

You can, apparently, legally grow 15kg of tobacco per adult per year in Canada based on this law:

https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/E-14.1/page-4.html#docCont

This Redditor has done the math and says that works out to 40 cigarettes a day.

https://www.reddit.com/r/canada/comments/4ad2eh/you_can_legally_grow_your_own_tobacco/

I am guessing that the additives in the cigarettes that are mass produced are, in part, necessary as preservatives because they need to have a decent shelf life.

[–] gimpchrist 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

Oh yeah you absolutely can legally grow your own.. but I feel like natives got shafted and they should be able to grow in Mass produce them for sale.. preservatives for decent shelf life aren't necessary you don't need cigarettes that last 40 years haha people just want it that way I guess.. but I'd rather buy cigarettes with nothing but tobacco in them and throw out a couple of moldy ones at the end then smoke fromaldehyde and whatever the fuck else are in the mass produced.

Anyway I'm being downvoted into Oblivion for existing on this thread I guess so I'm going to peace out

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

You have 1-3 downvotes on some comments and you think this is being mass downvoted into oblivion?

[–] gimpchrist -1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I'm just sensitive today it's a bad day don't mind me

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart 1 points 8 months ago

A gramme is always better than a damn.

[–] FlyingSquid 1 points 8 months ago

40 years? I don't know how long cigarettes without preservatives can last without going stale, but when I used to smoke, I'm sure the cigarettes I smoked had preservatives in them and they still got stale after a few months. And I doubt they're selling so quickly they can afford to not put in preservatives and risk having to throw out a bunch of product.