this post was submitted on 07 Jul 2023
109 points (91.6% liked)

Atheism

4116 readers
65 users here now

Community Guide


Archive Today will help you look at paywalled content the way search engines see it.


Statement of Purpose

Acceptable

Unacceptable

Depending on severity, you might be warned before adverse action is taken.

Inadvisable


Application of warnings or bans will be subject to moderator discretion. Feel free to appeal. If changes to the guidelines are necessary, they will be adjusted.


If you vocally harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathizer or a resemblant of a group that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of any other group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you you will be banned on sight.

Provable means able to provide proof to the moderation, and, if necessary, to the community.

 ~ /c/nostupidquestions

If you want your space listed in this sidebar and it is especially relevant to the atheist or skeptic communities, PM DancingPickle and we'll have a look!


Connect with Atheists

Help and Support Links

Streaming Media

This is mostly YouTube at the moment. Podcasts and similar media - especially on federated platforms - may also feature here.

Orgs, Blogs, Zines

Mainstream

Bibliography

Start here...

...proceed here.

Proselytize Religion

From Reddit

As a community with an interest in providing the best resources to its members, the following wiki links are provided as historical reference until we can establish our own.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I'll start! There was a lot of absolutist rhetoric there that said things along the lines of "All Christians are terrible, horrible, no good, very bad people!" I think a little nuance is in order, no?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] confluence 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Carnelian 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No I knew what you meant, I just would like to see where you’re getting that idea from

Not to sound adversarial, that’s not at all my intention. But you can’t just say common human desires are a conditional requirement for humanity without strong evidence to back it up.

I could just as easily say “Wanderlust is an essential part of what makes us human. Everyone needs to travel the world and connect with new places and cultures. It’s ‘cause of the way our brain is”. Many people want to travel, yes, but is the way I phrased that correct? Can I prove that?

But either way, I agree with the spirit (hah) of what you’re saying, just feel like that’s a weird angle

[–] confluence 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm not sure we're on the same page yet. Please bear with me...

Spirituality refers to concerns with the inner human experience. Dualists would say they're concerned with the "soul/spirit" of a person, but you and I know we're talking about emotional functions of the brain.

My whole point is that being concerned with inner experience is quite natural.

Naturalistic peeps like you and me would obviously prefer science-backed approaches to this (e.g. certain breathing exercises/meditation/mindfulness/productivity/self-improvement/education), but many people prefer superstition and fundamentalism... pursuing tradition-backed approaches.

The ignorance lies in the approach, not the concern.

Calling people stupid or ignorant for mere inner experience pursuits just isn't helpful, because inner experience pursuits... the design is very human 😂

That's not to say all people are or should be concerned about their experiences. It's just not dumb for people to be concerned about it.

[–] Carnelian 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Yeah like I said I know what you’re saying. I think it was just phrased weirdly. Your third and also your final paragraph better represent how I (not that I’m anyone important) would have liked to have seen the idea communicated in the first place

Edit: also still seriously curious on a source for the neuroscience you’re referring to

[–] confluence 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

To provide you a source I guess I'll need to know the parameters of your question. There's a lot that goes into subjective feelings of connection, concerns with inner experience, recognizing our place in larger systems, etc.

[–] Carnelian 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

To be honest, I think if I try to continue this conversation I’m going to become unacceptably snarky. So I’m gonna dip. I appreciate your perspective, please enjoy your weekend!

[–] confluence 1 points 1 year ago

Same to you, friend!