Programming

17313 readers

556 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Follow the programming.dev instance rules
Keep content related to programming in some way
If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities [email protected]

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

198

You probably don't need GraphQL (mxstbr.com)

submitted 7 months ago by testeronious to c/[email protected]

25 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 7 points 7 months ago (1 children)

...by someone who didn’t really deeply understand the HTTP specification, or at least couldn’t really articulate why they needed a new tool that used less...

Thousand yard stare at SOAP

Yo dawg, I heard you like XML over HTTP so I put XML in HTTP in your XML over HTTP.

So many technologies doing crap that plain old HTTP already does:

name a resource: URL
discover verbs for a resource: OPTIONS
execute a verb: the actual request
define a response type: Headers

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago

Thousand yard stare at SOAP

Yo dawg, I heard you like XML over HTTP so I put XML in HTTP in your XML over HTTP.

Made me spit my drink, laughing. Thank you. Very true.