this post was submitted on 12 Apr 2024
1042 points (95.2% liked)

People Twitter

5283 readers
351 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a tweet or similar
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod 6 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Considering that someone can win the presidency without winning the popular vote, and that the Senate gives states with tiny populations equal power, and that the House should have over a thousand members if we kept the same ratio, sometimes it doesn't matter if more people are pulling along with yout.

There's so many undemocratic things built into our government - mainly to appease slaveowners - it's really hard for me to work up any enthusiasm that my vote will do anything at all.

I can empathize with the people who have given up on voting, because I was at that point many times. Now I've lowered my expectations and given up hope, and I just vote because it means I don't get told I'm not allowed to complain.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Totally agree with everything. Voting is pretty quick and easy though. I absolutely agree with people performing other actions that can possibly be more effective as well, but those take much more time and effort. Everyone should vote because, even if it doesn't have much effect, the amount of effect it has compared to the amount of effort it takes is high.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod 5 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Now that I can vote by mail I agree that the effort is worth the effect. But if I had to stand in line for hours just to see the Supreme Court or electoral college or Congress or a bunch of states jam the trolley handle in the other direction I don't think I could bring myself to do it if it didn't also mean I'm allowed to complain.

What bothers me, and I've seen expressed in other comments, is that the response to "voting doesn't matter" or "both sides are the same" is immediate dismissal, as if nobody should have any problem with the way things work.

Even the line "If you don't vote you can't complain" is mean and dismissive.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

You keep talking about every vote not mattering in a vote that was won by 200-some-odd people with over 3000 write-ins. That person who can make a measurable impact wouldn't have been in the position to do anything if just a few hundred more people had believed it was hopeless and just stayed home. So how do you justify that with your beliefs?

I get that the presidential election is broken on many levels, and many people's votes have little or no bearing on the final outcome, or that any likely outcome will even be ideal, but the implausible has happened before, depending on how people vote.

The one thing that has never improved the outcome is to shrug your shoulders and do nothing.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

If one person would have stayed home they would have won by 199 votes instead of 200. It would have taken 200 people staying home for it to be a tie. An individual vote only matters if the margin is one vote.

And the neat part is that even with that victory the other branches of government can mean that even this 200 vote victory doesn't do anything. Whose to say the state legislature doesn't impeach him for not doing his job and enforcing the law? Whose to say localities don't take it upon themselves to follow the law and arrest women getting abortions? Not only does one vote not really do anything, there's all kinds of checks built into the government to prevent action.

My point isn't that people should sit at home and do nothing, it's that they should be realistic in their expectations of voting being a way to take action. Yes, it's nice that in this one instance one guy is doing the right thing. The rest of the government will put a stop to that soon I'm sure.

If you want to really take action, create a list of demands and start vandalizing expensive things until they're met.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Ah yes. Every drop thinks it's not to blame for the flood.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod 0 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Tell me you didn't read the entire post without telling me you didn't read the entire post.

I've seen my very important and influential vote made meaningless by other parts of our government too many times to think it really helps. But I'm allowed to complain about that because I voted so that's nice.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I did read the post, but I really stopped caring when you said, to paraphrase, "I love democracy, but why can't we do what I want, regardless of what other people want." Yes, one vote matters very little. No, democracy doesn't always mean you get what you want. Yes, democracy depends on large groups of people actually putting in the effort to get their wishes heard. Yes, violent revolution is an option to achieve change, but adults prefer that as a last resort since violence often leads to death. As the old saw goes, soap box, ballot box, jury box, ammo box. You seem to have a great fondness for the first and the last, a grudging willingness to use the second, and a complete lack of awareness of the third.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod 0 points 7 months ago

Okay so you read it but you didn't understand it. Gotcha.