this post was submitted on 10 Apr 2024
228 points (98.7% liked)

News

23659 readers
3511 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The state of Missouri on Tuesday executed Brian Dorsey for the 2006 murders of his cousin, Sarah Bonnie, and her husband, Benjamin Bonnie, after an effort to have his life spared failed in recent days.

Dorsey’s time of death was recorded as 6:11 p.m, the Missouri Department of Corrections said in a news release. The method of execution was lethal injection, Karen Pojmann, a spokesperson for the department, said at a news conference, adding it “went smoothly, no problems.”

The execution of Dorsey, 52, occurred hours after the US Supreme Court declined to intervene and about a day after Missouri’s Republican governor denied clemency, rejecting the inmate’s petition – backed by more than 70 correctional officers and others – for a commutation of his sentence to life in prison.

Dorsey and his attorneys cited his remorse, his rehabilitation while behind bars and his representation at trial by attorneys who allegedly had a “financial conflict of interest” as reasons he should not be put to death. But those arguments were insufficient to convince Gov. Mike Parson, who said in a statement carrying out Dorsey’s sentence “would deliver justice and provide closure.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 30 points 8 months ago (2 children)

We also have state-sanctioned kidnapping, wherein the convicted are taken from their families and held against their will, sometimes for years at a time.

There are many good arguments against the death penalty. I don't think those that just rephrase what is done in an emotional way are good ones.

[–] ripcord 2 points 8 months ago

And the whole property seizure without due process thing (civil forfeiture) although each of these is somewhat less important than the last.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

no, you're right, especially as nearly every single independent study agrees with your first paragraph.

Prison generates profit first, solves crime... well not second, maybe ninth? Sixteenth? A hundred and twenty eighth?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I mean, you could argue that even if the criminal justice system in the US were massively improved, there would still be no reason to have the death penalty. And yet there could still be good reason to keep imprisonment as a consequence for many types of crimes.

I'm curious what your alternative is.

I don't think you want to tie getting rid of the death penalty to current inequities and private prison corruption unless in your ideal system it should make a return.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

it's not about "me" or "my" alternatives as I am not an expert. however, look at Sweden, Finland, Denmark, the Netherlands and New Zealand.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

The kidnapping analogy also applies to the Nordic countries, the Netherlands, and New Zealand. They all have governments which detain people against their will.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

you have absolutely lost my interest in this conversation if you're going to flat out state that the Nordic system is identical to the US

[–] MaroonMage 5 points 8 months ago (1 children)

But they didn't say that though?

They pointed out those countries also have jails/prisons that detain people against their will. That isn't the same as saying the systems are identical.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

yeah but the differences are so obvious there's no point in me engaging in this conversation, it's just a snooze fest of saying obvious things and arguing over semantics.

If they're engaging in gotchas like "oh HO, YOU said that the US prison system doesn't work and yet you acknowledge that in better systems they imprison people a LOT less, but that still means they imprison SOME people."

it's like yeah, thanks, I know, not interested in having a conversation like that.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

You have to read back through the thread. The whole point is that every country on earth justifies imprisonment for crimes. Calling it kidnapping doesn't make it wrong.

The same is true of the death penalty. Calling it murder doesn't make it wrong. It's a bad argument. This sub-thread was on that narrow topic.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago (2 children)

the comment I was responding to was suggesting (paraphrased) "execution isn't murder like imprisonment isn't kidnapping, you're just using emotive language to score points"

and I said (paraphrased) "many studies have proven that imprisonment doesn't work and therefore is actually an emotional reaction"

they said "yes but they still imprison people"

and I said "yes but they have better systems"

and they said "YES BUT they STILL imprison people"

I said "ok but that's not a very interesting conversation"

you said, "but they're right"

and i said "ok but that's not a very interesting converstion"

and you said "but they're right"

so - is this an interesting conversation to you? it's not to me.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago

Ok, I understand your perspective now. No, it's just going in circles. Let's move on.