this post was submitted on 09 Apr 2024
1627 points (95.9% liked)

Solarpunk

5591 readers
130 users here now

The space to discuss Solarpunk itself and Solarpunk related stuff that doesn't fit elsewhere.

What is Solarpunk?

Join our chat: Movim or XMPP client.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago (2 children)

The person you're responding to is talking about physics, not economics.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod 3 points 8 months ago (2 children)

They're mixing the two to attempt to make a point. "Post-scarcity" is an economic concept, and I've never heard that term used in physics.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

It's two separate statements. We don't live in a post scarcity world. Power grids have physical limitations regarding power in and power out.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod 1 points 8 months ago

Ah then it's just two non sequiturs that don't relate to each other

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

ah yes the physics concept of "post scarcity"

Power plant operators are known to have dreaded this inevitability. There will be no more electrons.

[–] Ross_audio 0 points 8 months ago

There's no point about talking about the physics of the grid without the economics.

The story of the New York blackouts is not one of groundbreaking physics.

It's the story of two lightning strikes, some very basic physics, and a systemic failure.

Understanding the systemic failure is not a physics question. Electricity is already well understood and that physics isn't changing.

A renewable grid is not a physics question either. It's one of regulation, redundancies and the end goal hasn't changed.

Saying "production and consumption on the grid must match" might as well be put in the pile with statements like "wires must be made of conductive material". They're just 2 things that haven't changed.