this post was submitted on 07 Apr 2024
324 points (96.8% liked)
Chevron 7
1341 readers
18 users here now
Chevron 7
A community for sharing humor about Stargate in all its iterations.
Rules:
- Follow the Lemmy.World Terms of Service. This includes (but is not limited to):
- Lemmy.World is not a place for you to attack other people or groups of people.
- Always be respectful of the privacy of others who access and use the website.
- Links to copyright infringing content are not allowed
- Stay on topic. Posts must be directly related to Stargate, be it a meme, joke, screenshot, discussion prompt, etc.
- Be good, don't be bad. You're an adult, or close enough, I trust you know how to act around people.
For more general Stargate content, visit [email protected]
founded 11 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I'm always annoyed when someone says meteor but means meteorite. But maybe this someone did it on porpoise.
The terminology bothers me too because it leads to exactly this problem near the ground: it's a meteorite only after it lands on the ground, so since a person has some height wouldn't a direct hit mean being killed by a meteor starting the process of becoming a meteorite? I realize this is multiple levels of pedantry lol
I would say yes, he was killed by a meteor since it hadn't quite hit the ground yet.
If it's a small meteorite, does it become a meteor again if someone throws it?
So the visible phenomenon. You can't get hit by that.
It's the thing from outer space as soon as it hits the ground. So to be fair that guy in the comic wasn't hit by one. You are right. :)
So... He was hit by a meteoroid and didn't mind?