this post was submitted on 04 Apr 2024
680 points (98.9% liked)

News

23683 readers
3546 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Maggoty 7 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Ahhh the, "the experiment is impossible" argument. Except no one ever argues that the math is wrong once the self sustaining tax system is explained. Because it's really quite simple. So we don't need an experiment for that do we?

We look at people's employment status and their financial literacy. And this is study number 1542 proving that it would not cause massive drop out from employment and people are capable of budgeting the extra money responsibly.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

And this is study number 1542 proving that it would not cause massive drop out from employment

And where, pray tell, has it proved that?

The only way that it would not cause a drop in employment is if UBI is not enough to live off, which defeats the whole purpose.

[–] Maggoty 4 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

UBI as an entire living stipend is an end state scenario; when automation is extremely advanced. Nobody serious is suggesting that for right now.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 8 months ago (2 children)

I think any definition of UBI that does not contain enough to live off is not really UBI.

And yes, to live off it, you'll be shopping in Aldi, eating very basic food, and living in an area that isn't very nice. I'm not suggesting you should be able to live on it in a nice area of SF or somewhere else with ludicrous property prices on UBI. It would probably involve some basic housing being thrown up by the government.

We already live in a society with enough money to ensure everyone can live. It would just be nice to get rid of the cruelty in the lower rungs.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago

We already live in a society with enough money to ensure everyone can live. It would just be nice to get rid of the cruelty in the lower rungs.

Very well said. Unfortunately, for some, the cruelty is the point.

[–] Maggoty 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Should the people who work in SF be able to live there?

One way to tackle the problem of wealth distribution is a UBI. Because it effectively just acts as an extra tax on the wealthy and a stimulus for the working class. It effectively rebalances the economy over time. It also helps people get better jobs, job training, and supports creative workers. Of course not everyone can get the "good jobs" but this makes the labor market more competitive so even the "bad jobs" will need to treat workers better to keep them.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago

I mean yeah, they'll have to. But they'll have to be paid enough to live there. If you're paying a janitor $80k because that's what he needs to vac to floors and empty the bins, companies might start asking "what the fuck are we putting our businesses in SF for?"

Remote work is another good equaliser there, but comes with the downside of remote workers also being available overseas and a lot cheaper.