this post was submitted on 30 Mar 2024
283 points (94.1% liked)
Microblog Memes
5750 readers
2692 users here now
A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.
Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.
Rules:
- Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
- Be nice.
- No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
- Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.
Related communities:
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I was making people question the original premise that a. No gynecological procedures involve sedation b. That this still occurs universally and contemporaneously and c. That male doctors somehow have exclusive and universal control over procedures and have denied sedation out of deliberate malfeasance.
You then tried to apply a false reading to an unrelated situation to create a false equivalency.
Your comment was as ludicrous as saying, "You don't like chocolate ice cream? So what you're saying is that you support the bombing of Palestine!!!!"
If perhaps you explained yourself in the original comment, I would not have assumed incorrectly.
Your question doesn't even fully cover point c, let alone a and b. I'm not psychic ๐คทโโ๏ธ
I didn't have to, because it was a question. Your ridiculous response is on you, buddy ๐คทโโ๏ธ
You absolutely didn't have to. And my response is absolutely on me. If your goal was to be ambiguous with your question, you achieved it. If your goal was to outline points a, b and c above, you did not succeed.
You're trying to impose a goal then claiming that I failed? You're really telling on yourself here bud