this post was submitted on 01 Apr 2024
116 points (98.3% liked)

World News

32968 readers
1354 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Linkerbaan 11 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Wonder if they had America sign off on it.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

If a consulate has similar status to an embassy, I'm guessing not. At that point they would be signing off on a direct bombing of Iranian soil, which is what they've been whisking around the Middle East trying to avoid.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

There's only been two attacks on embassies in modern history: the US on China, and now Israel on Iran.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago

It's worth noting that this was apparently a consulate attached to an embassy, and the embassy next door was not targeted. That might be the technicality that's covering their ass, but it's unbelievably close to the line if so.

About China, for the curious. There have been other, less air-based incursions into embassies.

[–] merthyr1831 9 points 10 months ago

The US giving Israel a bunch of military equipment (including nearing the sale of 50(!) F-15s) a few days before what appears to be an intentional provocation of a regional enemy to the US is something a little bit too on the nose.

Even if it's not the US helping these plans along, they certainly would love an opportunity for Israel to act as a proxy against the Iranian govt that they've been trying to justify war against for over a decade now.