United States | News & Politics

7380 readers

356 users here now

founded 4 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

124

Hay grown for cattle consumes nearly half the water drawn from Colorado River, study finds (www.latimes.com)

submitted 9 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

14 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Archived copies of the article: ghostarchive.org archive.today

The study itself is here

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] aodhsishaj 15 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (5 children)

I do not understand why we don't just plant switch grass and be done with it? It's native to a large swath of the arable land, doesn't require as much (in some areas any) irrigation and it's good for the soil. https://cropwatch.unl.edu/benefits-switchgrass-hay-and-forage

https://utia.tennessee.edu/publications/wp-content/uploads/sites/269/2023/10/SP701-B.pdf

Edit: Also 6.24 is closer to a third of 19.25 than it is a half. Which is still a massive amount of water. Why inflate the numbers by saying nearly a half?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Water which evaporates from reservoirs or wetlands isn't "drawn" from the river for human use. So it's about half of water removed for human use

[–] cjoll4 2 points 9 months ago

Thanks for the clarification!

load more comments (3 replies)