this post was submitted on 30 Mar 2024
304 points (96.6% liked)

World News

37433 readers
4505 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] PlantDadManGuy 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

"Many times *they're constrained by politics on the ground"

[Citation required]

See? We can be pedantic too. Asking for citations does not validate your opinion.

[–] CosmicCleric -2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

“Many times *they’re constrained by politics on the ground”

[Citation required]

https://millercenter.org/issues-policy/governance/presidential-constraints

https://www.pastemagazine.com/politics/progressive-politics/its-time-to-redraw-the-borders-of-politics-why-con

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/001872677602900307

https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/abs/practical-turn-in-political-theory/political-constraints/39E0E4EAC9C6BD9DA075F028607D6E5B

(There's more if you need it.)

See? We can be pedantic too. Asking for citations does not validate your opinion.

Apparently whenever anyone ever challenges you on a point you're making, they're always just being pedantic. Can never be anything else. Your repeated attempts to "Kill the Messenger" is rude, and is getting old.

You never come back with something that proves your point, you always just go on the attack against the person that's challenging you, as demonstrated in our current conversation.

I don’t suppose you could just actually back up your original point?

We’re supposed to be having a conversation, don’t take everything as a personal attack.