this post was submitted on 29 Mar 2024
624 points (97.4% liked)

MST3K

933 readers
1 users here now

Rules/guidelines/info

You know you want links, baby!

This community is hosted at https://lemmy.world/c/mst3k and moderated by:

If you were a mod on /r/MST3K give me a shout.

Confused about Lemmy/Fediverse? Here's a useful infographic

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
sanguinepar
ety3rd
624
Finally, an answer! (lemmy.world)
submitted 8 months ago by FlyingSquid to c/mst3k
228 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

(I know this is about Rifftrax, but we don't have a Rifftrax community.)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] groats_survivor 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Is this even true? Why would they keep breeding something inedible and practically useless hoping in thousands of years it'd be edible?

I really don't know, it just seems like a stretch

Edit: spelling

[–] FlyingSquid 26 points 8 months ago (2 children)

It is true. They can trace the genetic lineage. The original plant isn't totally inedible, it's just less nutritious and harder to process. The same is true with wild grains in the Middle East. precursors of domesticated crops like wheat and barley were cultivated from wild grasses which produced less, had less nutrition and took more effort to process into flour.

[–] ForgotAboutDre 20 points 8 months ago (1 children)

It's wrong to say they were useless like OP suggests. They were very useful. It was a crop you could reliably grow and come back to harvest.

It also stored very well. The breeding was only to make it more useful. It was always useful.

Much of the breeding was just selection. The crops you would pick and store would be larger. So we it came to plant your were using the biggest largest variety every year. A few generations of this would produce notable results. Then even finer and more deliberate selection would be done.

[–] FlyingSquid 9 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I didn't make the picture. I just felt that it was finally time to answer the question: Is corn a grass?

It has puzzled Bill Corbetts the world over.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Are grains grasses then? Is wheat and barley grass?

[–] FlyingSquid 4 points 8 months ago

I believe most grains are grasses, I don't know about all.

[–] groats_survivor 3 points 8 months ago

Ah that makes sense. Thanks