this post was submitted on 29 Mar 2024
123 points (93.6% liked)

politics

19104 readers
3717 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 16 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Buying a gun is a donation to the very worst members of the Republican party and permissive gun laws do far more to enable extremists than dissuade them.

I mean, so is paying taxes? I think equating purchasing any firearm from anyone to financing the republican party isn't really a sensible claim. It's not like the profit from every gun sale is going directly to the NRA.

If this bullshit worked, America would already be the safest country on earth by a huge margin.

If gun control laws were feasible in America I wouldn't have to arm myself to protect my family from a bunch of racist dudes in a militia......

If America was inhabited by reasonable people who would tolerate reasonable gun control laws, I would fully support them. We do not live in that country, nor do I ever foresee us living in that country.

Instead liberals have spent a decade of political effort to die on a hill without making an iota of progress. Guns laws are among the largest drivers of single issue voters to the GOP. Fighting this unwinnable battle has done nothing but drive gun sales and secure easy votes for conservatives.

Plus, even if we did somehow pass legislation through Congress, you really think the vultures on the current supreme Court would really let it stand?

The only way America has ever passed gun control laws is when the "wrong people" armed themselves and started to make "up right citizens" nervous. If you really want gun control, arm yourself and make the "upright citizens" question the wisdom of their own beliefs.

[–] PoliticalAgitator -1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I think equating purchasing any firearm from anyone to financing the republican party isn't really a sensible claim. It's not like the profit from every gun sale is going directly to the NRA.

You don't have to guess. Around $16 million dollars per year of that profit is going to far-right Republicans. It used to only be $8 million a year but for some mysterious reason it doubled in 2012.

Honestly, what more could the far-right possibly ask of their useful pro-gun idiots on the left? They're allowing fascists and fuckwits to buy all the guns they want and enriching deeply evil groups and giving the state all the excuse they need to execute minorities in the street. Another 6 months of propaganda and you'll be telling people on social media that it's heroic to let neonazis finish in your mouth.

Fighting this unwinnable battle has done nothing but drive gun sales and secure easy votes for conservatives.

Not very consistent in your ideals are you? We've been waiting 40 years for guns to deliver on all the bullshit promises that gun advocates make. They're going to stop crime, but the crime rate is functionally identical to the rest of the wealthy world, only with a layer of murder on top. They're going to stop tyranny, but America is on the brink of fascism. They're going to save all the minorities, but the most vulnerable groups are openly attacked by politicians and media organizations, with none of the progress made being owed to guns.

You're here literally trying to drive up gun sales for a battle that isn't just unwinnable, it's demonstrably unnecessary.

Plus, even if we did somehow pass legislation through Congress, you really think the vultures on the current supreme Court would really let it stand?

Damn that sucks bro have you tried shooting them with your cool guns?

The only way America has ever passed gun control laws is when the "wrong people" armed themselves and started to make "up right citizens" nervous. If you really want gun control, arm yourself and make the "upright citizens" question the wisdom of their own beliefs.

Oh you mean the Black Panther Party? The people who did the exact thing you're talking about? The ones who were demonized by the media and executed by the state? The ones whose goals still haven't been achieved?

I know you're trying for the slimy pro-gun "gun control is racist" talking point but all you're really doing is giving an example of a group that committed to exactly what you're advocating and it didn't fucking work.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

You don't have to guess](https://www.opensecrets.org/industries/lobbying?ind=Q13). Around $16 million dollars per year of that profit is going to far-right Republicans. It used to only be $8 million a year but for some mysterious reason it doubled in 2012

Lol, 8-16 million dollars is a tiny fraction of gun sales in America, you just proved my point.

Honestly, what more could the far-right possibly ask of their useful pro-gun idiots on the left? They're allowing fascists and fuckwits to buy all the guns they want

My dude, they already have the guns. They already have their people in Congress and in the judicial system, gun laws are not happening. If you could actually pass them, I'd gladly give up my rifle.

very consistent in your ideals are you? We've been waiting 40 years for guns to deliver on all the bullshit promises that gun advocates make.

Lol, I'm not trying to solve crime, I'm just protecting my home. Mainly because the state is unwilling to do so.

You're here literally trying to drive up gun sales for a battle that isn't just unwinnable, it's demonstrably unnecessary.

Personal protection is an unwinnable battle?

h you mean the Black Panther Party? The people who did the exact thing you're talking about? The ones who were demonized by the media and executed by the state? The ones whose goals still haven't been achieved?

No I mean every weapons prohibition going back to before we were a country has been based on prohibiting people of color from protecting themselves. Free black families weren't even allowed to own guard dogs, as it made it harder for lynching mobs to have their fun.

slimy pro-gun "gun control is racist"

Can you name a weapons prohibition in America that was not spurred on by race relations in America?

You are just a privileged liberal who has no grasp on anything outside your lily white bubble of comfort your life has afforded you.

I still haven't heard how exactly you would confront someone who's trying to do you violence. I know you have no experience being hated for the color of your skin, but I'm sure you have an imagination of sorts. So, how do you talk your way out of a hate crime?

[–] PoliticalAgitator 1 points 7 months ago

Lol, 8-16 million dollars is a tiny fraction of gun sales in America, you just proved my point.

What point? You barely made one. You claimed it was unfair to claim that gun sales fund Republicans but offered no other source for that money.

As far as I can tell, you're just limply offering vague "it's not even that much money" comments, pretending like you'd casually turn down a $15 million per year budget at work.

My dude, they already have the guns. They already have their people in Congress and in the judicial system, gun laws are not happening. If you could actually pass them, I'd gladly give up my rifle.

Yep, and now they're suckering undesirables into giving them an excuse to use them.

Lol, I'm not trying to solve crime, I'm just protecting my home. Mainly because the state is unwilling to do so

Love that you didn't say you're defending people in your home, because you've put them at demonstrably more risk.

But that was never really the point anyway was it? You didn't buy cameras, or motion lights, or alarms, or stronger locks. You bought a rifle. It's not only less effective as a form of security, it's not even a good gun for the job.

Personal protection is an unwinnable battle?

It's a battle that literally only exists in your imagination and you're sacrificing actual peoples lives for your cringe little hero fantasy where you murder someone for trying to steal your iPad.

No I mean every weapons prohibition going back to before we were a country has been based on prohibiting people of color from protecting themselves.

LOL you absolutely didn't mean that. You specifically said "gun control" and now you're trying to wriggle your way out of it with more bullshit.

Black people didn't shoot their way out of oppression and widespread gun ownership has done absolutely nothing to promote equality, it's just gotten more people murdered.

You are just a privileged liberal who has no grasp on anything outside your lily white bubble of comfort your life has afforded you.

I'm sure that would have really hurt my feelings if I somehow didn't know anything about myself or the life I've lived. Could you have made it any clearer that you're trying to self-soothe? You don't even have a profile picture to go on.

I still haven't heard how exactly you would confront someone who's trying to do you violence

And you still haven't told us how you're going to shoot the people in your imagination (although I guess the higher suicide risk you've opted everyone in your house into might cover it).

I know you have no experience being hated for the color of your skin,

It would almost be worth doxxing myself just to show you how fucking stupid you look claiming to "know" things. Are we really supposed to politely pretend your opinions aren't worthless as we watch you literally imagine things and then claim to know them as facts?

So, how do you talk your way out of a hate crime?

No, I'm not joining you in your fantasy world, especially when there are actual hate crimes to use. So how should George Floyd have shot his way out of systemic violence? What about Trayvon Martin? Fuck, how about Amir Locke?

Don't be coy, tell us exactly when they should have drawn their gun and started firing and how they would have lived happily ever after if they'd just let the gun lobby finish in their mouth.