this post was submitted on 29 Mar 2024
28 points (91.2% liked)

Selfhosted

40394 readers
620 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
ruud
Loki
CannaVet
devve
HybridSarcasm
[email protected]
28
Verifying -arr Downloads? (self.selfhosted)
submitted 8 months ago by machinin to c/selfhosted
17 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

I found an av1-labeled version of a TV show on Sonarr, so I downloaded it, replacing my previous 264 version. I started to play it and realized it was a smaller 264 version.

Is there a way for Sonarr and Radarr to verify if a download's version matches it's label? Do I just need to stick with trusted distribution groups?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] machinin 6 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Would the keywords help with mislabeled files?

Thanks for the ideas on the failsafe. I'll check into it.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Mislabeled files, not so much. Since there isn't really a way to verify the content until it's downloaded. You can adjust things like which file sizes are considered a certain quality, e.g. HD or 4k. But one approach could be that you define tags for release groups which you know and trust. And give those tags a higher score. This should lead to releases by those groups being preferred.

You can of course add multiple tags with positive and negative scores. For example I use tags to give a higher score to releases that have 5.1 audio, or which are non-hdr.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 8 months ago

Qbittorrent has a feature to execute a command on torrent complete iirc. You might be able to write a few ffmpeg commands to verify and delete/move/whatever based on that result. Not very user-friendly though ofc and requires some bash knowledge.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

No, it doesn't help.

The only help for this is to be on a reputable tracker which cares about quality. That's usually private trackers

[–] machinin 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Any suggestions about how to subscribe to private trackers?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago (1 children)
  1. Install arr
  2. Look into prowlarr and search for the trackers that are listed there. Filter for what you are looking for.
  3. Look for trackers that have open applications.
  4. Apply with a text about your torrent behavior, what you are looking for and what you bring to the table.
  5. Become invited to your first tracker.
  6. Over time, apply to other trackers with the same method.
  7. Alternatively ask nicely for invites on your private tracker but don't over due this and only if your repuration is high enough.
[–] machinin 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Thanks, this is helpful.

How do trackers advertise that they are open for applications?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago

It's stated on the website. Either you can register, or you can't.