this post was submitted on 26 Mar 2024
33 points (97.1% liked)

Antiwork

7688 readers
43 users here now

  1. We're trying to improving working conditions and pay.

  2. We're trying to reduce the numbers of hours a person has to work.

  3. We talk about the end of paid work being mandatory for survival.

Partnerships:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
33
My companies RTO FAQ (pastebin.com)
submitted 6 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
19 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

My formerly amazing company just sent us this in an internal email. Unfortunately, too long to post here so I pastebin` it. Hopefully this is allowed.

My apologies if it's not.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 9 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I personally believe that this is what some of these employers want, including my own. They want to reduce headcount without paying severance or unemployment.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

In many states, being forced back to the office after working from home for a long period allows you to collect unemployment if you quit on those grounds. Check your state's requirements. IIRC it has to be demonstrable to be a significant burden but it can count as constructive dismissal.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago

Unfortunately, most don't understand the system, don't know their rights, and won't pursue it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

Is California one of them?