this post was submitted on 25 Mar 2024
974 points (97.1% liked)

memes

10677 readers
2736 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to [email protected]

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

If there was an artifact that was meant to go to a museum id rather have it go to one where the most people can see and enjoy a piece of my areas history rather than set it up in a case in a third world country shack

[–] LemmyKnowsBest 6 points 9 months ago (2 children)

well maybe that historical piece would be a great benefit to the economy of that third world nation and they could grow and thrive and not be third world country anymore

[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago

I doubt that. But it should still be that country's choice as to where to display their artifact. The person above you is making sense in general but missing the point in this context.

[–] afraid_of_zombies 2 points 9 months ago

Well lemmy knows best I have you know that lemmy last week told me that they only reason anyone goes to Thailand is for hookers. When I pointed out all the amazing historical stuff to see there, and included pictures of some of it, the group mind insisted that I was wrong and they knew the truth.