this post was submitted on 23 Mar 2024
74 points (93.0% liked)

PC Gaming

8999 readers
1545 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FrowingFostek 42 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I like the idea of these companies dumping all this money into a technology to replace people, only for people to not buy the product that tried to replace people.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Honestly, companies that pull that sort of shit kinda do deserve to die

[–] FrowingFostek 10 points 10 months ago

Yes and when real AI is developed, they won't like what it has to say about your current economic system, so they'll pull the plug. If this situation hasn't already happened unbeknownst to us.

[–] HowManyNimons 2 points 10 months ago

Ubisoft systematically abuse their human employees. Maybe this is a good use case for AI.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago (2 children)

We all know people aren’t going to turn away

[–] Potatos_are_not_friends 1 points 10 months ago

Ideally wait for it to be on sale.

Ubisoft games drop in price pretty fast.

[–] FrowingFostek -3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

They will, LLMs have no soul. I will always know I'm speaking to a Language model. True AI will be revolutionary, this imposter will fall flat.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Normal NPCs don't have souls either TBF.

[–] FrowingFostek 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Right, normal NPCs are written by people.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

These NPCs would have to be written by people too. Otherwise you'd just get ChatGPT. Depending on complexity, it might even require more writing work.

[–] FrowingFostek 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I like to think writers pour their souls into their work. LLMs are an amalgamation of other people's work not the work of a person creating a character. Your argument is NPCs don't have souls, obviously that's an objective truth. I'm just saying give me the SOUL.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Again, the character would still be written and defined by a human writer, pouring their soul into it just like they would a "dumb" NPC. I don't see how that "soul" is lost by giving that human-written character the capability to naturally respond to language.

[–] FrowingFostek 1 points 10 months ago

This is exhausting. I don't think LLMs are capable of making a captivating enough character. Nothing I've seen thus far has led me to believe they have the capacity for creativity. That is what I consider soul.

Which I believe people and only people can achieve at this moment in time.