UK Nature and Environment

476 readers

30 users here now

General Instance Rules:

No racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia or xenophobia.
No incitement of violence or promotion of violent ideologies.
No harassment, dogpiling or doxxing of other users.
Do not share intentionally false or misleading information.
Do not spam or abuse network features.

Community Specific Rules:

Keep posts UK-specific. There are other places on Lemmy to post articles which relate to global environmental issues (e.g. slrpnk.net).
Keep comments in English so that they can be appropriately moderated.

Note: Our temporary logo is from The Wildlife Trusts. We are not officially associated with them.

Our winter banner is a shot of Shotley marshes, Suffolk by GreyShuck.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

England won’t adopt EU river pollution rules for pharma and cosmetics firms (www.theguardian.com)

submitted 11 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

8 comments fedilink hide all child comments

New EU rules which introduce “polluter pays” principles to get pharmaceutical and cosmetic companies to pay for the pollution they cause in rivers will not be adopted by the government in England, as campaigners say the country is falling behind.

Lawmakers in Europe have signed off on an update to the urban waste water treatment (UWWT) directive, which is to further tighten restrictions on pollution. More nutrients from agricultural waste and sewage will have to be removed from waterways under the new rules. It also for the first time applies standards to micropollutants such as chemicals from pharmaceutical waste.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Z3k3 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

England's decisions are inherently inflicted on the test of the UK either directly via UK legislation or indirectly via things like the Barnet formula where its a case of follow suit or Hurt something else