this post was submitted on 22 Mar 2024
267 points (98.9% liked)

Science Fiction

13617 readers
1 users here now

Welcome to /c/ScienceFiction

December book club canceled. Short stories instead!

We are a community for discussing all things Science Fiction. We want this to be a place for members to discuss and share everything they love about Science Fiction, whether that be books, movies, TV shows and more. Please feel free to take part and help our community grow.

  1. Be civil: disagreements happen, but that doesn’t provide the right to personally insult others.
  2. Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, ableist, or advocating violence will be removed.
  3. Spam, self promotion, trolling, and bots are not allowed
  4. Put (Spoilers) in the title of your post if you anticipate spoilers.
  5. Please use spoiler tags whenever commenting a spoiler in a non-spoiler thread.

Lemmy World Rules

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 32 points 7 months ago (2 children)

I have to say his books make you think. I think he is under appreciated as an author.

People miss the point of Starship Troopers because of the movie. The book is nothing like the movie.

[–] FlyingSquid 38 points 7 months ago (2 children)

He was pretty misogynistic and kind of nuts, but I do enjoy his books, especially The Moon is a Harsh Mistress, which is a great example of how to use a science fiction setting to retell a historical event.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I think that it is unfair to say that about Heinlen that he was misogynistic. The women in his books were strong and capable. He may have been sexiest, but he wasn't misogynistic.

Another thing to note is in many of the books, he changes the point he is trying to make. He is an interesting author as he covers a vast number of topics.

[–] FlyingSquid 16 points 7 months ago (2 children)

I don't know if I would agree with you. Maybe he wasn't misogynistic earlier in life, but by the end? Did you ever read Friday? It's kind of disturbing. Yes, the main character is a woman who is better than a normal human through genetic engineering. She also enjoys getting raped.

[–] RaoulDook 11 points 7 months ago

I think you misunderstood that whole scene. Friday was pretending to like the rape to throw the rapists off guard, so she could find her way to get the upper hand and kill them.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 7 months ago (1 children)

book vs person. Heinlen explored ideas.

and no, I have no read that one.

[–] FlyingSquid 11 points 7 months ago (3 children)

When the idea is "if you get gang raped, just lie back and enjoy it," I think that says something about the person.

[–] NoRodent 18 points 7 months ago
(×) I don't discuss my colleagues' works or my own. A novelist writes from
many viewpoints; opinions expressed even by a first-person character are not
necessarily those of the author. Fiction is sold as entertainment, not as fact.
(×) Please do not write to me again.
                        Sincerely yours,
                                         Robert A. Heinlein, by ____
[–] [email protected] 12 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Not always. If it was a constant them then yes, but Heinlen was complicated. It’s like saying Stephen king likes to murder people.

[–] half_built_pyramids 7 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

It's okay to think rapey stuff is bad.

I haven't read this story, and it is ironic that Heinlein's list makes a point about the characters viewpoint not being the author's.

~~I'm~~ In that same point he also goes on to say that fiction is entertainment. It's also okay to like rapey entertainment I guess is the argument your making. Maybe you'd like the sword of truth books. Or some stephen r donaldson.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 7 months ago

I haven’t read that book, so I can’t comment on it.

Starship troopers is all fascism but Heinlen wasn’t a fascist.

His books were to make you think or explore a topic.

[–] blackbelt352 4 points 7 months ago

That idea is also a very common thing in Ayn Rand's writing too, which he's said he was quite influenced by her writing in an interview in the mid 70s.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago

He was pretty misogynistic and kind of nuts

Not to mention very much into eugenics.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 7 months ago (2 children)

@wintermute_oregon @FlyingSquid At very least, Verhoven's film was one of the most point by point perfect parodies of fascism we've ever seen. The original novel, IIRC, was written out of terrified nuclear paranoia and very sincere in its genocidal authoritarianism.

[–] Pronell 13 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

I've never seen it that way - the opening pages say what the protagonist is doing. He's landing on a planet to kill bugs, using all his ammo and nukes even though there are sentient beings living on the planet.

All because it isn't cost effective to evacuate the ammo as well.

Immediately following that we move to the viewpoint of the teenager being brainwashed.

As such I think the movie did a decent job of adapting the story, even though we lost those awesome mechs and dropships.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Boy have I got news for you- Starship Troopers3: Marauder has mechs. I haven't seen the next three movies/serieses.

[–] Pronell 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Ah, I've never seen any of the sequels. Might check it out, thanks.

[–] redhorsejacket 5 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Only do so if you have high tolerance for bad filmmaking. I've seen the live action sequels, and they are BAD. The second film feels like an unrelated script that got attached to the IP for name recognition. As I recall, it's dull, poorly acted, ugly, and cheap. The third film does lean into the IP, complete with satirical propaganda gags and, yes, mech suits make an appearance. However, my recollection of the rest of the movie is that it is dull, poorly acted, ugly, and cheap, but less so than the second.

If you enjoy Sci Fi Channel original movies from the early 00s, these movies are birds of a feather with those.

[–] Pronell 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I honestly don't have the time to watch all the shit I want to anyway, so it's a long shot.

[–] redhorsejacket 2 points 7 months ago

Fair. I felt I should jump in and provide some more context than the other poster for exactly that reason. The worst thing a movie can be to me is dull, and those sequels qualify, in my opinion.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Sincere how? Heinlen was a raging liberal.

[–] NielsBohron 16 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

In his memoir I, Asimov, Isaac Asimov wrote chapters about his contemporaries and apparently Heinlein was notorious for changing his political convictions based on who he was married to/sleeping with at the time. Hence, free-love hippie in Stranger in a Strange World and boot-licking war-hawk in Starship Troopers.

[–] DaMonsterKnees 5 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Interesting, thanks for the info, and great name! I found a first edition of his in a basement bookstore in Switzerland as a teen. Totally random, I know.

[–] NielsBohron 2 points 7 months ago

Interesting, thanks for the info

No problem! Obviously, I like talking about this stuff. And if you're interested, I'd also recommend reading the whole book. It's pretty fascinating, although in his reminiscing and pontificating, Asimov does get a little "get off my lawn" for my taste at times.

great name! I found a first edition of his in a basement bookstore in Switzerland as a teen. Totally random, I know.

Thanks! And it's not too random, I'd say; we're in a sci-fi forum talking about historical sci-fi writers, many of whom were also trained as scientists, after all.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Heinlein changed his mind.

There are 7 years between Starship Troopers and The Moon is a Harsh Mistress, during which the world didn't end or devolve into anarchy.

That's a long time to think about something, especially if you do so by writing an entire book about the theme.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago

Well, then there's what he said in the form letter above, that the views expressed in fiction aren't necessarily those of the author in real life.