this post was submitted on 20 Mar 2024
82 points (94.6% liked)
Formula 1
9098 readers
239 users here now
Welcome to Formula1 @ Lemmy.world Lemmy's largest community for Formula 1 and related racing series
Rules
- Be respectful to everyone; drivers, lemmings, redditors etc
- No gambling, crypto or NFTs
- Spoilers are allowed
- Non English articles should include a translation in the comments by deepl.com or similar
- Paywalled articles should include at least a brief summary in the comments, the wording of the article should not be altered
- Social media posts should be posted as screenshots with a link for those who want to view it
- Memes are allowed on Monday only as we all do like a laugh or 2, but donβt want to become formuladank.
Up next
2024 Calendar
Location | Date |
---|---|
πΆπ¦ Qatar | 29 Nov-01 Dec |
π¦πͺ Abu Dhabi | 06-08 Dec |
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
From memory FOM were alleging she leaked confidential information to Toto and that a number of teams had raised concerns. However every single team publicly came out and said they hadn't raised any concerns, and the Wolffs both came out saying nothing had been shared. FOM eventually dropped their investigation.
https://www.bbc.com/sport/formula1/67654980
It wasnt FOM alleging, it was the FIA. Then the FIA investigated the FOM.
Which made it pretty clear to me that this had nothing to do with Suzie and a lot to do with the FIA-FOM conflict.
Sorry, that sounds right. As I said, was going off memory, thanks for clarifying!
Cheers! I like the bit about the co-ordinated statement, exposing a lie.
Why? They're married, they're supposed to, you know, talk to each other. Communicate. Coordinate their actions. You know, like, a functional couple.
I mean, nobody knows except these two if something critical was actually shared, but a coordinated statement is the least sus part of the story.