this post was submitted on 17 Mar 2024
218 points (92.2% liked)

Space

9359 readers
812 users here now

Share & discuss informative content on: Astrophysics, Cosmology, Space Exploration, Planetary Science and Astrobiology.

Rules

  1. Be respectful and inclusive.
  2. No harassment, hate speech, or trolling.
  3. Engage in constructive discussions.
  4. Share relevant content.
  5. Follow guidelines and moderators' instructions.
  6. Use appropriate language and tone.
  7. Report violations.
  8. Foster a continuous learning environment.

Picture of the Day

The Busy Center of the Lagoon Nebula

Related Communities

๐Ÿ”ญ Science

๐Ÿš€ Engineering

๐ŸŒŒ Art and Photography

Other Cool Links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L7ePvmEn
Bitswap
[email protected]
Agamemnon
otter
218
New research suggests that our universe has no dark matter (phys.org)
submitted 11 months ago by kinther to c/space
73 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] Daft_ish -4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

These type of comments always throw me through a loop.

Scientist:

Makes hypothesis, does analysis, writes paper, and presents work for other academics to review.

Lemmy poster:

Logs into lemmy. Posts "i think not mr scientist". Recieves upvotes.

While I would certainly like to say I understood any of this. This post has not met any rigorous standard of debunking the researchers findings.

It's fine if you have knowledge on this particular subject but it kinda seems like you're just throwing shade.

[โ€“] acetanilide 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I get what you're saying, but peer review isn't exactly all that rigorous either

[โ€“] Daft_ish 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

They meet the bare minimum of at least being a peer in their field of research.

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

While I would certainly like to say I understood any of this. This post has not met any rigorous standard of debunking the researchers findings.

Thats not what the posting claimed to be. You missunderstand. Either intentionally or just as a fact.