this post was submitted on 13 Mar 2024
722 points (96.5% liked)

Science Memes

11189 readers
2877 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.

Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.

Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
722
Malaria (fedia.io)
submitted 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
152 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZLkbWUNQbgk&t=308s

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 9 points 8 months ago (2 children)

i remember hearing, that their argument was, that a strong profit-incentive would motive the manufacturer to increase production as well as quality. I also remember that the debate around that topic was drowned out by some weirder theories. E.g. during that time q-anon was on the rise, and some people argued, that the gates foundation was using covid to implant microchips into people or something like that

source: my memory from a couple years back

[–] Anticorp 2 points 8 months ago

Thanks. Sounds like the same ol "free market" argument then.

[–] SporeAdic 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

A not insignificant line of reasoning (though probably less important to people in power than the profit incentive) was also to keep the secrets of making the vaccine from bring revealed to other countries, which would apparently erode the USA's pharmaceutical research advantage. An interesting article about this from the former director of NIST is here but I don't necessarily agree with the reasoning.