this post was submitted on 03 Jul 2023
2733 points (98.3% liked)

Technology

59118 readers
3534 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Google has reportedly removed much of Twitter's links from its search results after the social network's owner Elon Musk announced reading tweets would be limited.

Search Engine Roundtable found that Google had removed 52% of Twitter links since the crackdown began last week. Twitter now blocks users who are not logged in and sets limits on reading tweets.

According to Barry Schwartz, Google reported 471 million Twitter URLs as of Friday. But by Monday morning, that number had plummeted to 227 million.

"For normal indexing of these Twitter URLs, it seems like these tweets are dropping out of the sky," Schwartz wrote.

Platformer reported last month that Twitter refused to pay its bill for Google Cloud services.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Antaeus 44 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Very good. An evil corporation doing evil things to an evil agenda.

[–] [email protected] 49 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I mean, is it evil? Seems like removing results that can't be seen without a login might make sense. Google has plenty of faults but I don't know if this is one of them

[–] Kolrami 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Did Pinterest used to require logins to see their images? I remember I used to get annoyed when search results directed me to that site

[–] WhatUpFlava 5 points 1 year ago

They absolutely did (do? I never visit it)

[–] mcepl 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

If it is just a revenge for Elon not paying fees for the Google hosting, it would be very evil indeed. Of course, from Lemmy point of view, it is just reason to get more popcorn.

[–] Marxine 7 points 1 year ago

I gotta be careful about my sodium intake from all the popcorn.

[–] kennydidwhat 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The details are unclear as to why these links were removed. Opining on Alphabet's morals at this point is premature.

[–] Lenins2ndCat 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It's not premature because calling Google evil has absolutely nothing to do with this action.

[–] kennydidwhat 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

We don't need to make up reasons to call corpos such as Alphabet evil. The fact of the matter is that at this time, nobody even knows if Google lifted a finger to forward the delisting of Tweets. For all we know, it could be entirely on Twitter's end.

Hence, assigning blame to Google for this without understanding their role in it is premature.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

It could also be the search algorithm reacting to all the users returning to google after seeing only the login page

[–] ieatpillowtags 7 points 1 year ago

He also said “doing evil things” but I’ve seen no evidence that they have “done” anything. This could be just be the algorithm responding to these tweets no longer being visible without login.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Funny Google's motto is 'don't do evil'

[–] [email protected] 39 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It used to be. They removed that.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Well at least nobody can call them hypocrites.

[–] Cabrio 5 points 1 year ago

Remember when Google separated their parent services into a new company called Alphabet? Alphabet's motto isn't 'don't be evil'.