Technology

59210 readers

4221 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

543

UK Trial: Pornhub's Chatbot Halts Millions from Accessing Child Abuse Content (www.wired.com)

submitted 8 months ago by [email protected] to c/technology

246 comments fedilink hide all child comments

A trial program conducted by Pornhub in collaboration with UK-based child protection organizations aimed to deter users from searching for child abuse material (CSAM) on its website. Whenever CSAM-related terms were searched, a warning message and a chatbot appeared, directing users to support services. The trial reported a significant reduction in CSAM searches and an increase in users seeking help. Despite some limitations in data and complexity, the chatbot showed promise in deterring illegal behavior online. While the trial has ended, the chatbot and warnings remain active on Pornhub's UK site, with hopes for similar measures across other platforms to create a safer internet environment.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] -3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

It'd still be CSAM whether AI or not.

[–] FilthyHookerSpit 6 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Don't know why you're down voted. You're right, it's CSAM, which encompasses any depiction of CP.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Because "CSAM" states abuse as the third word in the acronym. Machine learning could (in theory, I lack knowledge on the current implementations) be trained without any children being abused (in any traditional sense anyway) and used to produce the content without any real children being involved (ignoring training data).

The downvotes likely come from a difference in definition between abuse and CP, images of nonexistent people cannot realistically harm anyone.

[–] FilthyHookerSpit 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Personally, I don't think it's arbitrary. A child in a sexual scenario is a depiction of abuse. Normal, healthy children don't engage in such behaviors.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 8 months ago

depiction yes, but if no person or animal is harmed is it abuse?