Technology

58306 readers

3180 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

298

Signal's Meredith Whittaker scorns anti-encryption efforts as 'parochial, magical thinking' | TechCrunch (techcrunch.com)

submitted 6 months ago by Dehydrated to c/technology

21 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] mipadaitu 6 points 6 months ago (2 children)

How about we cut back on the misogyny.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Technically not misogyny—just good ol’ fashioned objectification.

[–] asdfasdfasdf -2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

IDK, I wouldn't say calling someone hot is even objectification. You can respect someone who you consider smart and there dimensional and also think they're hot.

I'd say it's just inappropriate.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I agree he said it in the wrong way, but is now misogyny to acknoledge that in addition to being really smart she is also a nice looking woman ?

[–] mipadaitu 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

It is wrong, because it's makes it uncomfortable for women to be in power, or in the public eye.
Every time we allow it, it normalizes the problem, and perpetuates it.

She's out there trying to make it harder for governments and corporations to abuse our personal data. We want to uplift THAT message, not reduce it to a discussion about her appearance.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

It is wrong, because it’s makes it uncomfortable for women to be in power, or in the public eye. Every time we allow it, it normalizes the problem, and perpetuates it.

I don't really think that woman in power positions or in the public eye are that easily offended by a compliment (or an insult).

She’s out there trying to make it harder for governments and corporations to abuse our personal data. We want to uplift THAT message, not reduce it to a discussion about her appearance.

I get that. I only said that maybe to call misogyny a compliment on the look of a woman on top of all her other qualities maybe it too much. "she is really smart" and "she is nice looking" are not mutually exclusive in a discussion.

[–] mipadaitu 2 points 6 months ago

1 - It's not just about HER. It's all the other women who see her and see what's actually being discussed in public about her.

2 - It's NOT A COMPLIMENT. She's not looking at this thread and saying "wow, I'm glad that dude thinks I'm kind of hot." it's a whole group of people having a discussion about a very important product on the market, and someone trying to start a side conversation about appearance. It has no business being in this thread, and it makes half the population less welcoming to the discussion.