this post was submitted on 01 Mar 2024
553 points (99.3% liked)

Memes @ Reddthat

917 readers
2 users here now

The Memes community. Where Memes matter the most.

We abide by Reddthat's Instance Rules & the Lemmy Code of Conduct. By interacting here you agree to these terms.

Rules

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

With, out, fail...

Also anyone got a new job available?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 31 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Screen sharing works in what? 99% of cases?

It works 95% of the time but it often takes 10+ seconds until everyone can see the screen.

I get your point, but teams is such a broken mess that I think the question is legitimate. Half the time it doesn't even register my microphone even if Windows doesn't have a problem with it.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 months ago (3 children)

Fun Fact, Teams under Linux works way better than under Windows...

[–] [email protected] 6 points 7 months ago (2 children)

That's the exact opposite of what I've read in most linux threads on here. Most people seem to complain about teams not working at all under Linux.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

~~That's the exact opposite of what I've read in most linux threads on here.~~ Most people seem to complain about ~~teams not working at all under~~ Linux.

FTFY.

I use Arch btw.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago
[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 months ago

Teams not working at all is already way better in my opinion

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

The PWA? Shouldn’t it work the same everywhere?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

No, the arch package, i think they use the Debian one.

[–] veng 1 points 7 months ago

I tried it about 2 years ago and it was a fucking omnishambles on Linux. I presume it has improved since then..

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Honestly, Teams works pretty much flawlessly for me. It's a resource hog and some actions (like switching between tabs) are inexcusably slow, but it works pretty well 99% of the time.

[–] glimse 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Maybe it's because I have a pretty beefy work laptop but I rarely have issues with Teams. I dread Zoom calls, though. The video quality seems worse and whatever noise reduction Teams has doesn't seem to exist on Zoom so it sounds bad, too. Not to mention the ugly interface

That said I'll take Zoom over webex any day. Thankfully Cisco is the only company I work with who uses it... And we make them use Teams when we host there meeting

[–] Kallioapina 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

It's funny, I've very recently had pretty much the opposite experiences with the Teams/Zoom reliability.

I had and interview project, and and in about 50% (around 15 out of 29-31, something like that) of the cases Teams calls failed pretty much in the beginning due to some technical problem, almost always the problems coming from the other end, on 1 case something unexplainably went to shit on my end (suddenly no sound or video), and I think of my self being pretty tech savvy on the user side. We had to fall back to phone calls for those "It's just Teams, no problems, I understand" cases.

In the Zoom calls, 5/5 worked without issues.

Wonder why this is such recurring issue. I mean, havent Microsoft poured hundreds of millions of euro/dollars into the app/infrastructure? Where is the money going?

[–] glimse 1 points 7 months ago

Could it be the way the system was commissioned? My company designs and sells conferencing systems so I'm 100% confident it's been configured correctly. When we "take" clients from other companies, we routinely find issues.

I don't work on the commissioning/programming side of things (I'm in pre-install system design) so I can't speak to the details. I just read the project close out reports sometimes