this post was submitted on 28 Feb 2024
142 points (98.0% liked)

Linux Gaming

15910 readers
47 users here now

Gaming on the GNU/Linux operating system.

Recommended news sources:

Related chat:

Related Communities:

Please be nice to other members. Anyone not being nice will be banned. Keep it fun, respectful and just be awesome to each other.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Alex Deucher:

The HDMI Forum has rejected our proposal unfortunately. At this time an open source HDMI 2.1 implementation is not possible without running afoul of the HDMI Forum requirements.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 131 points 9 months ago (18 children)

Since we now have confirmation that an open implementation is legally impossible I would consider the HDMI forum to be a cartel and not a standarts comitee. Therefore it should be dismantled by anti-trust authorities asap.

[–] LufyCZ 29 points 9 months ago (16 children)

But displayport exists, is widely used and is free?

[–] kerobaros 27 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Because DisplayPort is run by VESA, who better understand the appeal of an open standard.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 9 months ago

DisplayPort is open in name only. The specifications are locked behind membership (and requisite fees of ~$5k/yr - just enough to keep most hobbyists and the like out while being less than a rounding error for big companies).

[–] LufyCZ 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

That's not the point of my comment, the point is that whatever hdmi is, it's got very healthy competition, so there's no real reason for anti-trust stuff

[–] [email protected] 8 points 9 months ago (1 children)

No it doesn’t, because it’s generally monitor manufacturers that add display port, and people who want to run on large tvs are SoL

[–] LufyCZ 0 points 9 months ago (2 children)

That's on the tv manufacturers though, it's their choice.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago

When most TV manufacturers are part of the HDMI "standards" committee, they obviously have a vested interest in not using other technologies, especially when they provide many of the accessories used with TVs. If they allowed competing standards on their TVs, why would consumers buy their products instead of the competitors?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago

A choice they are making in favor of a tech cartel instead of what is best for their customers, which is the problem we want addressed

load more comments (13 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)