this post was submitted on 27 Feb 2024
50 points (96.3% liked)
Star Trek
1230 readers
2 users here now
/c/StarTrek: Your safe harbored Spacedock in these Stellar Seas!
Fire up the inertial dampeners, retract all moorings and clear space dock. It's time to boldy go where no one has gone before!
~ 1. Be Civil. This is a Star Trek community and lets keep that energy. Be kind, respectful and polite to one another.
~ 2. Be Courteous. Please use the spoiler tags for any new Trek content that's been released in the past month. Check this page for lemmy formatting) for any posts. Also please keep spoilers out of the titles!
~ 3. Be Considerate. We're spread out across a lot of different instances but don't forget to follow your instances rules and the instance rules for Lemmy.world.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Welcome, everyone! The way I described what I personally hope for this community is a place to have fun discussions about Star Trek that aren't stuffy like DaystromInstitute on Reddit but also not pure silliness like Ten Forward (although I'm probably going to be the first one to end up being silly anyway, I can't help myself). But there is definitely a place on Lemmy for people to talk Trek in a friendly way about subjects us fans care about.
My one personal rule is this- Star Trek canon doesn't really exist and we shouldn't pretend it does. It changes all the time. Even within a series.
That's not a rule I'm going to enforce as a mod or anything, it's just something I will not hesitate to point out when I see it.
And you don't have to take my word for it. Ex Astris Scientia has a massive inconsistencies list. They make a valiant attempt to explain away as many as they can, but they admit failure all the time too.
https://www.ex-astris-scientia.org/inconsistencies.htm
They even have a page of stuff people think is canon but is not.
https://www.ex-astris-scientia.org/inconsistencies/false_canon.htm