this post was submitted on 25 Feb 2024
529 points (97.5% liked)

Technology

59675 readers
4836 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] [email protected] 10 points 9 months ago (1 children)

This seems a lot more complicated and much worse than just using actually cryptographically secure keys to verify that it's the real key.

[โ€“] Ledivin 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

Or just not storing your key where it can be repeated ๐Ÿคช this attack is 100% mitigated by some distance or just fuckin' aluminum foil.

[โ€“] Calcium5332 6 points 9 months ago

You would need to put your keys in a faraday cage.

Distance doesn't matter, as they can just use a bigger antenna or better amplifier. You find footage of people using large loops of wire to capture the signal from the keys

[โ€“] piecat 6 points 9 months ago

Sure, you could and probably should do that. But is that something the consumer should have to do?

At what point is a design flaw/defect the consumer's responsibility?