this post was submitted on 23 Feb 2024
1228 points (89.3% liked)

Memes

45753 readers
2106 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Are you claiming that Victorian England could take modern America in a fight?

[–] Aux 13 points 9 months ago (1 children)

A few trolls can take America by installing a puppet red head president who will then dismantle the country in a few years time.

[–] Dr_Fetus_Jackson 8 points 9 months ago (1 children)

We prefer you call him The Great Pumpkin, thank you.

[–] KredeSeraf 16 points 9 months ago

See also

  • Adolf Twitler

  • Benedict Donald

  • Cheeto Benito

  • Cheeto In Chief

  • Cinnamon Hitler

  • Comrade Cheetolino

  • Con-Hair

  • Despot Cheeto

  • Diaper Don

  • Draft Dodger Don'

  • Fanta Menace

  • Hair Furher

  • King Mierdas

  • The Manchildian Candidate

  • Mango Mussolini

  • Orange Julius Caesar

  • President Gold Man Sucks

  • Prima Donald

  • Pumpkin Pinochet

  • Tangerine Toddler

  • Tangerine Tyrant

  • Trumplethinskin

  • Tweeto Toupee'to

  • The White Pride Pipe

[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

So are you trying to make him say what he didn't say because your butthurt ?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago (2 children)

So you agree America is more powerful than the British Empire?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 9 months ago (1 children)

In military power, yes. Greatest empire ever, no.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

One, no empire is "great," they all suck donkey dick, that's the definition of an empire, two, the meme specifically states "most powerful."

America is objectively the most powerful empire to ever exist, just as the British were more powerful than the Romans.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago (2 children)

i think the only thing keeping china from taking that top slot is reach and the use of the dollar worldwide. both of those are collapsing. the US might not be the biggest asshole on the planet for much longer

[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago

Eh... don't count on it. China has some significant weaknesses. In the short term, economic growth has slowed significantly. Debt in the private and public sector is having consequences, both in the housing market and elsewhere. In the longer term, China is aging at a faster rate than the US, both due to a low birth rate and immigration rates that are virtually nonexistent compared to the US. China's GDP is outpacing the US for now, but it's an open question how long that pace will last.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago

Yeah, instead we'll get a nation that treats North Korean workers so poorly they riot and execute the management.

Good times for humanity ahead...

[–] z00s 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

OK, what's your basis for objective measurement?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

The ability to literally kill all multicellular life on Earth is a good starting point for "powerful"

[–] z00s 0 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Along with Russia, China, India, France and the UK. And North Korea and Pakistan.

And no, the US doesn't have the greatest number. That's Russia.

So, no, the US is not "objectively the most powerful".

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_states_with_nuclear_weapons

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

That America's actually work tip the scales, along with having a military not made of meat grinder slaves and eighty year old Soviet tanks. Plus, you know, a real navy and air force.

And while modern France and peers could indeed no diff the Romans or Victorian Britain, only America and Russia have enough nukes to kill the world (go us!)

[–] z00s 0 points 9 months ago

Lol you're neck deep in propaganda

[–] z00s 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

I just wouldn't call it an empire, that's all. I'm not a historian but to me, empires are made by occupying other countries.

The US is a powerful nation of course, but they don't have the same focus on conquest as the other countries throughout history have had.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manifest_destiny

Just ignoring the concept of neocolonialism for a second, most American land was stolen through conquest. That the American Empire is not currently aggressively expanding is irrelevant, did Rome not count as an empire when its borders were stable?

[–] z00s 1 points 9 months ago

That would be interesting, to compare the land mass of the US with the max size of the Roman empire. My guess is that the romans would win by a hair.

But the Brits would definitely win because they have Australia, which is almost as big as the continental US just in itself, let alone all the other countries they conquered.