this post was submitted on 21 Feb 2024
417 points (96.2% liked)

Technology

59608 readers
3661 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
L3s
[email protected]
[email protected]
L4s
enu
417
Frozen embryos are “children,” according to Alabama’s Supreme Court (arstechnica.com)
submitted 9 months ago by L4s to c/technology
122 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Frozen embryos are “children,” according to Alabama’s Supreme Court::IVF often produces more embryos than are needed or used.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TaterTurnipTulip 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

It always strikes me as interesting that if the Bible truly was divinely inspired that there really should only be one translation and one interpretation. It should be incredibly clear and concise to everyone.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

Even if it was truly was, humans are still faillible:

  • the texts are transcripted thousands of times, and errors made during transcriptions are eventually reproduced.
  • the texts can be modified voluntarily during retranscriptions, maliciously or not.
  • parts of texts are lost and found again.
  • texts reference other extinct texts or what was considered common knowledge that was not written down. So we can only infer from there.
  • Hebrew uses an abjab alphabet, which means no vowels, so certain written words can be different depending on what vowels you ascribe to them.
  • texts are translated by people with biases and objectives as to what it should convey (like the US Evangelicals with the NIV).
  • etc.

So even if the original text was given divinely, it would end up being distorted.

This is why I'm not comfortable saying the Bible is okay with abortion. It can be interpreted that way, for sure, but it's not a definite statement.