this post was submitted on 21 Feb 2024
336 points (90.2% liked)

Programmer Humor

32571 readers
314 users here now

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] aoidenpa 20 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

I recently learned there are people that think emacs and vi are bloated. They like acme or sam or something. Iceberg is so deep.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

Ed users have not found the internet yet, otherwise they'd be in the war too

[–] [email protected] 6 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] Aceticon 7 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

"Ed", a.k.a. "edline" is a really old line by line editor in Unix.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Oh my god someone finally fell for it! Please don't edit your comment, you just made my day

[–] Aceticon 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

I chose to respond to the most likely meaning as it's also the response with the greatest utility value for the average person coming across this thread.

Responding to it as an "ed" prompt is pretty useless in this context.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Are you a Vulcan? O_o

Either way you have my thanks. Greatest utility value as well as greatest hilarity value!

[–] Aceticon 2 points 9 months ago

LOL!

It's been many years since I was so young that this was all it took to reach the level of hilarity.

[–] AnUnusualRelic 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] Aceticon 4 points 9 months ago
[–] Aceticon 2 points 9 months ago

Even Lynx is bloatware if you're a member of the Ed Sect.

[–] T156 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

When you think of a bloated text editor, you would not expect VI to be that. If anything, it's closer to the opposite.

[–] aoidenpa 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Check this out. It puts everything I thought that was, you know, more ethical to use to the harmful section and suggests some unknown and probably not very useful today stuff. Can someone explain if they have good points or not?

[–] T156 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Unclear. They don't give their reasoning beyond "complicated = bad", and very specifically leave it up to the imagination of the reader.

While they make some interesting points with regards to overcomplication and scope creep, there are also good reasons why we're still not using programs like ed as text editors, such as it being arcane and unintuitive.

vi will at least helpfully point out :exit is not an editor command. Instead, ed will not-so-helpfully point out ?.