this post was submitted on 17 Feb 2024
129 points (96.4% liked)
Space
8747 readers
7 users here now
Share & discuss informative content on: Astrophysics, Cosmology, Space Exploration, Planetary Science and Astrobiology.
Rules
- Be respectful and inclusive.
- No harassment, hate speech, or trolling.
- Engage in constructive discussions.
- Share relevant content.
- Follow guidelines and moderators' instructions.
- Use appropriate language and tone.
- Report violations.
- Foster a continuous learning environment.
Picture of the Day
The Busy Center of the Lagoon Nebula
Related Communities
🔭 Science
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
🚀 Engineering
🌌 Art and Photography
Other Cool Links
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
This doesn't seem to be space junk type pollution which is what space pollution is usually talking about. I guess this would be too minimize upper atmosphere metallic particles over the ocean? I haven't heard of that being an issue, but maybe if there were many times more satellites than there are today it would become an issue?
Yeah, this is to reduce atmospheric pollution when satellites deorbit, which is a separate problem from ensuring satellites deorbit in the first place. I hadn't heard that being an issue, but can see how it could be once the first generation of megaconstellation satellites (Starlink, Kuiper, and Guowang) reach the end of their life.
Incidentally Japan + Rocket Lab just launched a spacecraft to collect data for future orbital rendezvous and deorbit missions.
Looks like the research into upper atmosphere metallic contamination hasn't been studied much yet, they just know it's becoming more prevalent, but don't know that problems that creates yet. https://www.pnas.org/doi/full/10.1073/pnas.2313374120