this post was submitted on 15 Feb 2024
853 points (95.3% liked)

memes

10264 readers
3772 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to [email protected]

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

Sister communities

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
853
Look at hiiim (lemmy.world)
submitted 9 months ago by nifty to c/memes
 

Reposting bc I dun goofed before

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] mvirts 46 points 9 months ago (5 children)
[–] RoyalEngineering 22 points 9 months ago (2 children)

This is the most succinct way I’ve heard metric time explained. Very easy to understand the conversion and the reasons to use it.

[–] blanketswithsmallpox 20 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

UTC while abolishing time zones is the superior format anyway.

2024-02-15T23:30:33Z

Largest to smallest. The only other logical way is smallest to largest. But that gets annoying when filing systems are involved.

[–] mvirts 5 points 9 months ago

Except that there are actually 1.44 standard minutes in a metric minute

24*60/10/100=1.44

[–] pHr34kY 20 points 9 months ago (2 children)

It doesn't explicitly say it, but that redefines the second to be 1/100,000th of a day.

Doing that would break everything.

That said, I wish speed limits were in m/s. It makes more sense to me.

[–] Ultraviolet 14 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

Miles or kilometers per hour makes sense in the context of travel, you can very easily estimate how long it's going to take to get somewhere.

[–] calcopiritus 3 points 9 months ago

Ironically, km/h is better for estimation because hours are 3600 seconds. If an hour were 1000 seconds or whatever, it would barely take more effort to calculate with m/s

[–] pHr34kY 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

I was thinking about estimating stopping distances and reaction times. The number of metres you cover every second becomes important then.

[–] joel_feila 2 points 9 months ago

yeah, there was a point in time when we could have. Just now our standards are to ingrained

[–] [email protected] 7 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Not even 4am! I'm going back to bed.

[–] Zaros 4 points 9 months ago

Just leaving this here in case anyone is interested. A dozenal clock! Day (24h) divided to twelve parts divided to twelve parts, etc. https://clock.dozenal.ca/

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago

This is bullshit.

Seconds are already metric no need to redefine them.

Furthermore, if we redefine seconds we would also need to redefine a lot of other units.

This would result in massive confusion and a lot of avoidable errors in science and engineering, similar to what is already happening in the us with their bullshit freedom units.

It is not even that much harder if you get used to it.

If 86.4ks are too much to count for you, you could instead resurrect the metric prefix myria- for 10⁴. So 1day = 8.64 myriaseconds. And instead of minutes, use hectoseconds.