Music Theory
A community to discuss the technical workings of music.
Helpful symbols, for copy-pasting into comments
♯ ♮ ♭ 𝄪 𝄫 ø ° Δ ♩ ♪ ♫ ♬ 𝄐 𝄑 𝄞 𝄢 𝄡 𝆒 𝆓 𝄀 𝄁 𝄂 𝄃 𝄆 𝄇
#Rules
1. Stay on topic. All posts must relate to music theory.
2. Civility. Disagreements and discussion are great, but hostility, insults, and so on aren't. Any critiques should be focused on ideas, never on individual users.
3. No homework help on specific assignments. It is against the Academic Honesty Policy of most schools and courses. Our subscribers generally dislike this kind of behavior. Please ask your IRL teacher/tutor for homework help instead. It's important that we get such posts taken down ASAP, so in addition to reporting, please report such posts.
4. Don't make this place annoying. Memes and so forth are fine, but mods reserve the right to remove inappropriate or overposted material.
5. Promotion. Promotion of one's content is allowed, provided it is not excessive or mindless. If you regularly post your content but do not otherwise interact with the community, you will be banned. If you link to something that costs money, you must say so in your post.
#Related communities:
- Composer
- Song-a-Week
- Musicology
- Ethnomusicology
- Historically Informed Performance Practice (HIPP)
- Piano Discussion
- Classical Music
- Jazz
- Harpsichord
Regarding moderation and reporting: https://join-lemmy.org/docs/users/04-moderation.html
view the rest of the comments
Unfortunately, characters like Neely exist because of a general lack of knowledge and interest on the part of the public that also props him up. He's like any of these other TED Talk infotainment guys, circulating shallow, inaccurate, harmful ideas with absolutely no accountability.
Occasionally he's on the money. There's a video about tritones that I really don't object to. From a musicology/history of theory perspective, there's nothing controversial about it and I appreciate that he's pushing back on a common myth.
Other times, he says some really dubious stuff. There's that video about some modulation in a Celine Dion song that pieces together its argument from another feel-good edutainment music theory work that nobody examines critically, Harmonic Experience by W.A. Mathieu, and some idealistic embodiment stuff (vulgar though; he doesn't cite Arnie Cox or anyone like that, not that I think that would make it any better). The experienced analyst really has to suspend their disbelief. The harmonic dualism he draws from Mathieu was called out as nonsense back in the 19th century, for fuck's sake.
Then, there's another video on that Recorder Team lady's channel where we learn that Neely has never before heard of red notation or the rhythmic craziness of Ars Subtilior/Trecento music. Do they not teach music history at Berklee?
When I watch his videos, I get the pervasive sense that he only first encounters the concept at hand a few weeks before, and his familiarity with said topic is limited to what he researched for that specific video. He basically makes undergraduate research essays with a budget. And people pay him for it and take it for gospel.
Good take. My knowledge of music theory barely runs beyond what I am interested in as a composer (have forgotten so much, of course) so I don't really have a good way to judge his other theory videos.
The tritone video was one that I was thinking of that I liked and then also his anti-432 video. After that, I am realizing that I don't really watch many of his videos. Very few, actually, so who knows what gems I'm missing out on.
That's definitely a problem. I think he does try to be accurate but when he messes up he doesn't handle it well.