this post was submitted on 06 Feb 2024
638 points (96.2% liked)

News

23649 readers
3826 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CosmicCleric 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

You personally said “Nuclear waste is scary” - that’s why I said people fearmonger.

The point I was trying to make was that the plants operation was one risk, while it's waste output was a second risk.

That wasn't fear-mongering, that was stating facts.

But to be blunt, if an area is destroyed because of nuclear waste then that is kind of scary, a land that can't be lived in anymore (or for a very long time) it's something right out of a fiction story (Mordor-ish).

Expressing that is not fear mongering, its a real possibility, we see that today around nuclear reactors that have catastrophically failed. We humans rarely 'salt the Earth' so we can't live in a place anymore, it's anathema to what we believe in.

Nuclear is only dangerous when it’s irresponsibly used.

Which always happens sooner or later because human beings are involved. The current designs can't cope for humans being humans (especially for those who love profits) and their flaws are exaggerated to catastrophic proportions.

I also said people in general shouldn’t be so politically involved when they’re not informed, I actually said that because I shared and hoped you would be able to agree on that. I wasn’t demeaning you.

Well since you were replying to me directly in an argumentative tone, I could only assume that point was directed at me. And that statement is that I'm commenting uninformed, which is not correct, and hence why I pushed back.

What I do usually to avoid that misunderstanding is that I explicitly state something along the lines of "not you directly, but generally" when I'm trying to make a general comment in response to a specific individual.

I do appreciate you clarifying, and hope that was an honest clarification, and not just trying to avoid the pushback of the criticism that was initially correct.

And finally, I do agree, people should be informed when they comment, but as long as they're not being obstructive there's nothing wrong with also just expressing oneself to others, your fears and hopes, without knowing all the facts. This is supposed to be a conversation, and people can learn new facts while the conversation is happening, versus having to know everything before they enter the conversation.