this post was submitted on 07 Feb 2024
145 points (98.7% liked)

Ukraine

8579 readers
537 users here now

News and discussion related to Ukraine

🇺🇦 Sympathy for enemy combatants is prohibited.

🌻🤢No content depicting extreme violence or gore.

💥Posts containing combat footage should include [Combat] in title

🚷Combat videos containing any footage of a visible human involved must be flagged NSFW

❗ Server Rules

  1. Remember the human! (no harassment, threats, etc.)
  2. No racism or other discrimination
  3. No Nazis, QAnon or similar
  4. No porn
  5. No ads or spam (includes charities)
  6. No content against Finnish law

💳💥 Donate to support Ukraine's Defense

💳⚕️⛑️ Donate to support Humanitarian Aid

🪖 🫡 Volunteer with the International Legionnaires


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

https://t.me/nevzorovtv/13913

https://t.me/noel_reports/8107

https://t.me/operativnoZSU/135460


https://t.me/astrapress/47580

An explosion occurred near Izhevsk “during testing of rocket engines,” TASS reports, citing emergency services.

The explosion occurred in the area of the Votkinsk plant test site in the village of Yagul, 12 km from Izhevsk.

The Ministry of Emergency Situations, commenting on what happened, announced “technical work” at the Votkinsk Machine-Building Plant.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] A_A 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Can we estimate the diameter of the explosion ? I would guess between 2 km and 10 km. There will be satellite images later on : maybe it will take a few months before we (civil) know...

P.S. : Izhevsk ~~is~~ was about 1000km from Ukraine

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I would guess between 2 km and 10 km.

https://nuclearsecrecy.com/nukemap/

The largest strategic nuclear weapon ever built, a 50 megaton weapon, would produce a fireball slightly over 5 km.

I think that it is extremely safe to say that whatever fireball the factory had wasn't 10 km in diameter.

[–] A_A 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

N.B. : the Halifax explosion was about 0.003 megaton (2.9 kilotons of TNT)

(...) Every building within a 2.6_km (...) radius, over 12,000 in total, was destroyed or badly damaged. (...)
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Halifax_Explosion

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That'll be damage from the blast, rather than the fireball. Can't see blast damage in the video, so I assume that you're talking about the fireball.

[–] A_A 1 points 1 year ago

Yes, my first comment was about the fireball. Also, I am looking at the news today and there is not much more now than there was yesterday about it ... I will watch the news again to know more in the next few days.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Didn't the radius of damage have a fitting name?

[–] A_A 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Guess i meant "blast radius". Versus the fireball radius (this one has no fancy name). Just remembered nukemap.