this post was submitted on 05 Feb 2024
191 points (95.3% liked)

Technology

55773 readers
3812 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Amazon finds $1B jackpot in its 100 million+ IPv4 address stockpile | The tech giant has cited ballooning costs associated with IPv4 addresses::undefined

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 80 points 5 months ago (26 children)

All it takes is one big company like Amazon changing their services to IPv6-only and most of the world would be converted over in a month or two... but now I guess we know the reason WHY Amazon doesn't push such a policy.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 5 months ago (21 children)

A massive swathe of current gen devices don't even support it.

It won't be a month.

Microsoft announce changes much smaller than that 4 years out and still have to give extensions.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

Wasn't 64 bit adoption largely driven by Microsoft deciding they weren't making a 32 bit version of their next Windows at one point? It seems it might take something similar.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 months ago

Microsoft supports 32 bit processors still with windows 10. They died out because it was becoming clear that 4GB of memory wasn’t going to be enough for applications, and the low margins on budget chips didn’t warrant maintaining 32 bit designs when the 64 bit versions would do and could still run the 32 bit software.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 months ago (1 children)

No, 64 bit was widely adopted long before windows cut support. Keep in mind a 32 bit OS can only use ~4GB of ram, and most systems have been shipping with more than that for many years now.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Towards the end of 32 bit’s life, physical address extension allowed operating systems to use more memory, often up to 40 bits worth, but still could still expose a 32 bit address space to user applications.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Yes, but that would only get the total up to about 5GB, which isn’t very much more.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

2^40 is a terabyte

load more comments (18 replies)
load more comments (22 replies)