this post was submitted on 04 Feb 2024
270 points (94.7% liked)

Technology

59467 readers
4588 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
L3s
[email protected]
[email protected]
L4s
enu
270
How Quora Died (slate.com)
submitted 9 months ago by [email protected] to c/technology
112 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

“Why Do So Many Music Venues Use Ticketmaster?” “What’s It Like to Train to Be a Sushi Chef?” “How Do Martial Artists Break Concrete Blocks?” If you were looking for answers to such questions 10 years ago, your best resource for finding a thorough, expert-informed response likely would have been one of the most interesting and longest-lasting corners of the internet: Quora.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 87 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I think that's because Quora paywalls responses from volunteers, preventing others from seeing them unless they pay a subscription. Pretty scummy.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 9 months ago (2 children)

I wouldn't call it scummy, just bad business, give people one premium answer per week, so they know the quallity and at incentivised to pay.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Do they pay the people who answer the questions? I genuinely don't know. But if they don't then, yes, it is scummy to just profit off of someone else's work and not pay them.

[–] FinishingDutch 5 points 9 months ago (2 children)

I’ve contributed to sites like Wikipedia.

Not everything needs to be measured in money though. There’s inherent satisfaction in the work with things like this. And at the end of the day, we all benefit from having platforms with accurate, well thought out answers. Today you’re answering, tomorrow you’re the one with the question.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 9 months ago

@FinishingDutch @ahornsirup

But Wikipedia aren't charging people to see the work you contributed for free. That's a significant difference.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 9 months ago

Wikipedia is run by a nonprofit. They don't monetise volunteer contributions and they don't paywall the knowledge on their site, they run on donations. It's not really a comparable situation.

[–] AA5B 4 points 9 months ago

It is though, because they gamed search engines well enough to frequently be in the top results yet never had an answer you could see. Annoying as fuck