this post was submitted on 03 Feb 2024
176 points (78.8% liked)

Showerthoughts

30572 readers
247 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted, clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts: 1

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
    • If you feel strongly that you want politics back, please volunteer as a mod.
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 53 points 1 year ago (7 children)

Capitalism may hold us back in some regards but really helps in others.

The majority of people would likely be feudal peasants, working under a warmonger family that owns the sustaining land by force. No upward mobility except through bloodshed.

[–] distantsounds 47 points 1 year ago

I suppose not much has changed then

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The majority of people ~~would likely be~~ are feudal peasants, working under a warmonger family that owns the sustaining land by force. No upward mobility except through bloodshed.

FTFY

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

No you don’t understand, this 9-to-5 job that’s slowly but surely wearing me down is just a stepping stone to my millions of $$. That’s why I keep voting for tax breaks for the rich; because I’ve just been temporarily down on my luck for 30 years. /s

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No, if you're lucky, clever enough, overwork yourself, or manipulate others you can live a somewhat comfortable life. Those methods don't require taking a life.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

overwork yourself

comfortable life

Make it make sense

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Comfortable as in "you have a heated living space, food on the table, and security." Don't be dense.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's not living comfortably, that's the bare minimum everybody should have

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

100 years ago people round here still had no electricity and depended on wood stoves yet. You are really spoiled.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Capitalism optimizes for efficiency. Sadly slavery is terribly efficient in terms of economics. Therefore capitalism needs to be capped by society at certain acceptable limits. Which is called socioeconomics and its not perfect but the best system we have. insert handwavy remark about whatever america is doing here

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

the problem with this is that we depend on the capitalist overlords to keep their pinky promise of not fucking with our rights.

right now they are breaking it again because they can.

i also don't think having the majority of the money/value going to a few owners is efficient at all.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 year ago

Capitalism is based on free exchange and wage labor. Unless a slave has volunteered to be a slave, using a slave is not “free exchange”.

[–] FireRetardant 3 points 1 year ago

Thats still in a sense a commerce based system. The only reason that warlord fights for that land is because it has value, be it food, a cash crop, a strategic location.

Warlords hoarded land and power in similar ways billionaires hoard money and power.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's literally how it is now

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

When you lack the imagination to think about how it could be worse, you can still get the detailed descriptions of it from history.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And yet no one cares because this is what we're dealing with now

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No, you are not dealing with the life of a feudal peasant. Just stop

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No, we're dealing with worse. Much, much worse.

You can't make me stop

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No I can’t. Just one way in which your life is different than that of a feudal peasant.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yet you're still desperately trying so it's obvious our suffering is valid and that you can't just invalidate it by comparing our situation to that of people 500-600 years ago, can you?

You can keep trying to get one over on me, though. I suppose it'll take the sting out of the last two times you failed. 🍿

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

No, stopping requires your will. It's your decision. That's called "freedom" and it's an aspect of your life a feudal peasant wouldn't have.

I'm not trying to invalidate your suffering. You are trying to invalidate those people's suffering, by claiming their lives were just as easy as ours. Which they weren't. Those people went through shit we can't imagine.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Capitalism optimises for concentrating resources.

Dividends, return on investment, profits, etc. are all inefficiencies in the production of value, and require more resources, labor, and suffering per unit of value than for example a circular economy.

But it does concentrate wealth efficiently, which in turn gives access to enough resources to start larger ventures.