this post was submitted on 30 Jan 2024
142 points (85.9% liked)

Technology

59173 readers
2740 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
L3s
[email protected]
[email protected]
L4s
enu
142
Apple Has Sold Approximately 200,000 Vision Pro Headsets (www.macrumors.com)
submitted 9 months ago by L4s to c/technology
107 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Apple Has Sold Approximately 200,000 Vision Pro Headsets::Apple has sold upwards of 200,000 Vision Pro headsets, MacRumors has learned from a source with knowledge of Apple's sales numbers. Apple began...

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jerrythegenius 63 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Is that supposed to be a lot? I can't tell.

[–] phoneymouse 66 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Almost $700,000,000 in revenue if you multiply the price by the amount sold.

[–] jerrythegenius 29 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Aight

that's a fair bit

[–] abhibeckert 27 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

Keep in mind they probably spent more than that amount of money on R&D / aqua-hiring.

It's a lot of money, but still not enough to be a commercially successful product for at least a few more years.

[–] jerrythegenius 4 points 9 months ago

Fair point

[–] Tangent5280 -1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Over 700 million? I find that dubious. 700 million is a lot of money isnt it? Thats what I'd expect a tank or a jet to cost in R&D.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 9 months ago (1 children)

R&D for a jet or tank is significantly more. To not throw out nonsense some quick googling told me the R&D just for an upgrade of the Abrams tank (which is old) is $650m and the total R&D of the F22 jet over two decades was $32B....

[–] [email protected] -5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Well, nice to know somebody lives in such a peaceful part of the planet to not be interested in cost of creating a tank or a jet.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

What a strange response ...

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I meant that the person you were answering to is happy to never have been interested in those things.

Say, there are countries where people are genuinely interested in whether their government is able to create some kind of a MIC and a functioning military as a deterrent in following years with the budget they have.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago

Gotcha. Yeah... Since they said "expect" I wasn't really judging that perception, I mean I too would like to "expect" R&D on tanks and jets to be under a billion dollars so that the USA didn't have to spend $900B/yr on "defense"

[–] Thekingoflorda 17 points 9 months ago

And you should keep in mind that these things are only sold in the USA at this point

[–] NOT_RICK 7 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I’d say that’s certainly enough to attract developers given it’s barely out.